Laserfiche WebLink
irt rr i.7ioJ sr;u�4f Yg b of 1b <br /> Husults of U.S. EPA Standard Evaluation <br /> tVOlumetric "tank Tightness 'felting Method <br /> This form tells whether the tank tightness testing method deschued below complies with <br /> the performance requirements of the federal uncerground storage tank regulation. The <br /> evaivation was conaucted by the equipment manutacturer or a consultant to the <br /> manufacturer according to the U.S. EPA's "Standard West Procedure for Evaluating Leak <br /> Detection Methods: Voiumetr c "Tank Tightness Testing Methodss." The full evaluation <br /> report aiso includes a iorr:j describing the method and a form summarizing the test data, <br /> i ank owners using this leak aetection system snou!d Keep this torm on file to prove <br /> compliance with the Tederal regulations. Tank owners should check with State and local <br /> agencies to make sure inns form sat.sTies their requirements. <br /> Ver ,on Number SERIES PA0265/PA0300/PA03j.2 Probe <br /> t\: '. i .• ice;:F•.. ✓� - <br /> -IJQt7 VV. srrien.dly Ay6, P. U. Box 22087 <br /> street address; -� <br /> rg1_t&_ 2 4?G _._i919)-54-/7-5000_ <br /> {c;itvl Istarej _.--f ipi (phone) <br /> rvdluaiSu;1 Results <br /> f'his method, which aeciares a tank to be leaking when the measured ieak rate exceeds <br /> the threshold or . ._(�7.1_gallon per hour, has a probability of taise alarms [PIFA)l of 1.0%. <br /> The corresponding probability of detection (P(D)l of a 0.1. gallon per hour leak is a.0%. <br /> Thereiore, this metnud 2 does 0 does not meet the feaeral performance standards <br /> established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 10.1 gallon per hour at P(D) of <br /> 95% arta PiFA? of 5"i:,1. <br /> Test Conditions During Evalua,i oir <br /> The evaluation testing was conductedlin a.10.000 gaiion `�N StCuli 11 tiberwass tank that <br /> was 96 inches in diameter and 324 inches long, <br /> The temperature dtiterence between product addea to till the tank and product already <br /> in the tank ranged from _- ; 1 .4,4 'F to 7.7_`F, with a standard deviation of 5.71 'F. <br /> Tree prod:,ci used ;n the evaluation was No. 2, Diesei,. <br /> Voiufne*riu TTT Method - Results dorm Page 7 of 2 <br />