Laserfiche WebLink
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS -2- <br /> NEWARK GROUP INDUSTRIES, INC. <br /> NEWARK SIERRA PAPERBOARD CORPORATION <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> noncontact recreation; esthetic enjoyment; navigation; and preservation and enhancement of fish, <br /> wildlife and other aquatic resources. There are no known beneficial uses of McDougald Slough. <br /> 7. The permitted discharge is consistent with the antidegradation provisions of 40 CFR 131.12 and <br /> State Water Resources Control Board Resolution 68-16. The impact on water quality will be <br /> insignificant. <br /> 8. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted the Water Quality Control Plan for <br /> Salinity, San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary on 1 May 1991. The Plan <br /> includes water quality objectives. This Order implements the Plan. <br /> 9. The SWRCB, on 16 May 1974, adopted Resolution No. 74-43 titled "Water Quality Control Policy <br /> for the Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California". These requirements are consistent with the <br /> Policy. <br /> 10. The SWRCB Water Quality Control Plan for Control of Temperatures in Coastal and Interstate <br /> Waters and Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California (the Thermal Plan) is applicable to this <br /> discharge. For purposes of the Thermal Plan, the Discharger is considered to be an Existing <br /> Discharger of Thermal Waste. <br /> 11. The Board, in a public hearing on 20 December 1974, adopted Resolution No. 74-563 which <br /> granted to Fibreboard Corporation (now Newark Sierra) an exception to Provisions 5.A.(1)C and <br /> 5.A.(2) of the Thermal Plan. The exception was authorized because the Board found that <br /> compliance with the Thermal Plan would have required modifications to the facility not <br /> commensurate with the benefits to the aquatic environment. The exceptions were approved by the <br /> SWRCB and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. <br /> 12. Federal Regulations for storm water discharges were promulgated by the EPA on 16 November <br /> 1990 (40 CFR Parts 122, 123, and 124). The regulations require specific categories of facilities, <br /> which discharge storm water associated with industrial activity (storm water), to obtain NPDES <br /> permits and to implement Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (BAT) and Best <br /> Conventional Pollutant Control Technology (BCT) to reduce or eliminate industrial storm water <br /> pollution. <br /> 13. The State Water Resources Control Board adopted Order No. 91-13-DWQ (General Permit No. <br /> CAS00000I) specifying waste discharge requirements for discharges of storm water associated with <br /> industrial activities, excluding construction activities, and requiring submittal of a Notice of Intent <br /> by industries to be covered under the permit. This Order further specified that if an individual <br /> permit is adopted for storm water runoff from a facility, then the General Permit would no longer <br /> apply. This individual permit and the provisions it contains concerning stormwater relieves the <br /> Discharger from seeking coverage under the General Permit. <br />