Laserfiche WebLink
Disputed Violations from LLNL Site 300 Hazardous Waste Generator <br />September -October 2015 Inspection <br />CCR 66262.11 -Failed to determine if a waste is a hazardous waste <br />Violation <br />Violation Description <br />LLNL Dispute Explanation <br />EHD Response <br />EHD Decision <br /># 106 <br />At building 810 Bay 1, solid waste, <br />The solid waste was not stored in a <br />At the time of inspection, the operator of building 810 <br />The violation stands because the container <br />including wipes and Q -tips, was <br />hazardous waste container. Refer to <br />Bay 1 told the inspector that the container was an <br />was identified as a hazardous waste container <br />observed in a 55 -gallon drum that was <br />Attachment 7, page 16. <br />empty hazardous waste container. The contents <br />during the inspection but was storing an <br />identified by the building operator as a <br />were not consistent with the type of container and <br />unidentified waste. <br />"Form 4 hazardous waste container". <br />may point to a training issue for the operator of that <br />location and whomever deposited the waste into the <br />container. <br /># 106 <br />At Corp Yard 843, two 55 gallon drums <br />The iron filings were purchased for use in an <br />Iron is not a hazardous waste unless it was <br />At this time, the violation stands. Please <br />and one open 5 gallon container of iron <br />evaluation of in situ iron filings for VOC <br />contaminated with a hazardous waste such as VOCs. <br />provide additional information regarding the <br />filings were observed. <br />remediation and are still considered product. <br />use of the iron filings. Were these particular <br />Refer to Attachment 7, page 5. <br />iron filings used in the VOC remediation <br />project? If so, a hazardous waste <br />determination must be made. <br /># 106 <br />At south of building 875, one 55 gallon <br />The contents inside the drum were identified <br />The LLNL response identified the contents of the <br />The violation stands because a hazardous <br />drum of unknown solid nearby a heavy <br />as lead pipe joint seal product. It is usable <br />drum as a result of the violation. <br />waste determination had to be made due to <br />equipment outside. <br />product. <br />the unknown status of the drum at the time <br />of inspection. <br />HSC 25189.5(a) Disposed <br />or caused disposal of a hazardous waste at an unauthorized point <br />#202 <br />At building 806, oil leaking from a <br />The oil did not drip into the non -hazardous <br />During the inspection, the dripping oil was only <br />At this time, the violation stands. Please <br />machine was seen dripping into the <br />waste water trench (drain). The oil was <br />cleaned up when it was pointed out by the inspector. <br />provide additional information regarding how <br />drain. The waste from the drain was <br />immediately cleaned up and placed in a <br />The operator of the area explained to the inspector <br />this leaking oil was prevented from entering <br />confirmed as being hauled off as non- <br />Satellite Accumulation Area hazardous waste <br />that any waste in that trench would end up in the <br />the non -hazardous waste water tote/tank as <br />hazardous. <br />accumulation container. The container will <br />outside waste water collection tote/tank and is <br />it is unlikely the first time the machine leaked <br />be transported to the B883 Waste <br />hauled off as non -hazardous waste. <br />was during this hazardous waste inspection. <br />Accumulation Area, then transferred to the <br />At a minimum this may be failed to minimize <br />on-site TSDF, before shipping to the off-site <br />the release of a hazardous waste violation. <br />TSDF as hazardous waste. <br />