Laserfiche WebLink
Rev date: 12.3.15 Attachment 6. LLNL Violation Tracking Spreadsheet- Hazardous Waste Generator RECEIVED <br /> September-October 2015 <br /> LLNL Site 300 DEC 04 2015 <br /> Violation Regulation/Code Violation Description Inspection Report Action Status ENVIRONMENTAL <br /> Report Item q Violation Class Item HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> Immediately contact a <br /> licensed hazardous waste <br /> 602 CCR 66262.34(e)(1)(B) STORED SATELLITE ACCUMULATED WASTE ON SITE LONGER THAN ONE YEAR OR 90 DAYS AFTER FILL hauler to dispose of this <br /> Class I DATE waste under manifest and <br /> submit a copy of the <br /> manifest to the EHD. <br /> CCR 66262.34(e)(1 )(B) Stored satellite accumulated waste on site longer than one year or 90 days after <br /> fill above. <br /> ill date. <br /> At 875 upper Corp Yard, several containers of Nexguard 22352, Nalco 2895 Plus, Chemtreat CL49,Transport Violation acknowledged and corrected. <br /> Plus 2858 and Nalco 2833 in a shed and four containers of chlorine tablets in a outhouse were observed. <br /> According to David Rockstead,these chemicals are no longer in use ever since he "came here almost four Hazardous waste facility personnel removed all containers in storage unit <br /> a years ago." See above. that are no longer needed including the chlorine tablets, and managed as a <br /> hazardous waste. Hazardous waste manifest will be provided after waste <br /> shipped to off-site TSDF. <br /> Refer to Attachment 7, page 25. <br /> According to Robert Bates, high explosive machining fines collected in filter bags throughout the high LLNL requests SJCEHD to rescind the violation. <br /> explosive processing areas could potentially be held for clients'future use, which "could be as long as 10 <br /> years" . Satellite accumulated waste shall not be stored on site for more than 90 days after the container See above. The explosives were considered material;therefore,the requirement to <br /> b was filled, or a total of one year,whichever comes first. Immediately contact a licensed hazardous waste comply with 22 CCR 66262.34 (e)(1)(B) does not apply. <br /> hauler to dispose of this waste under manifest and submit a copy of the manifest to the EHD. <br /> 605 CCR 66262.34(f) FAILED TO COMPLETELY LABEL CONTAINERS OR TANKS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE <br /> Class II <br /> CCR 66262.34(f) Failed to completely label containers or tanks of hazardous waste. <br /> The following observations were made during the inspection (a-f) <br /> All hazardous waste containers shall be marked with the following information: <br /> -the words "Hazardous Waste' <br /> -name and address of generator Immediately contact a <br /> -hazardous properties licensed hazardous waste <br /> hauler to dispose of this <br /> -physical state Manifests to be provided for 602a, 605c,605e, 605f <br /> -composition (contents) waste under manifest and <br /> -accumulation start date submit a copy of the <br /> manifest to the EHD. <br /> Immediately label these containers and ensure that all containers are marked with all the required <br /> information. Since these containers have been on site longer than 90 days, immediately contact a <br /> licensed hazardous waste hauler to dispose of this waste under manifest and submit a copy of the <br /> manifest to the EHD. <br /> At building 807, a filter bag of high explosive waste removed from the process was not labeled.According to LLNL requests SJCEHD to rescind the violation. <br /> Robert Bates,the filter bag of high explosive machining fine is pulled to separate out the different high <br /> a See above. <br /> explosive wastes and is temporarily stored to dry on the drain. The explosives were not considered hazardous waste;therefore, the <br /> requirement to comply with 66262.34(f) did not apply. <br /> RCRA Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generator Inspection Report 9 <br />