Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> � 'yl <br /> • PH <br /> October 3,,2002 2002 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> of the former UST (exclusive of the on-site water supply well) is located more than 1,000 feet <br /> from the former UST while the contaminant plume apparently extends less than 100 feet from <br /> the former UST The site facility well is located approximately 0 feet northwest <br /> (downgradient) of the ormer UST The closest upgradient well to the former UST is the <br /> domestic well located at the residence on the southwest corner of Almondwood and Oleander <br /> This well is located approximately 80 ft south-southeast of the former UST Well construction <br /> details for this well and for the facility well were not available A copy of the table and figure <br /> from the well receptor survey are included in Attachment E <br /> + SJC/EHD expressed concerned that Ground Zero performed no fate and transport modeling to <br /> support the theory that this is a low risk site <br /> Response: In our opinion, the data collected from this site during the course of this <br /> investigation are more than adequate to illustrate that this is a low risk site The tank removal <br /> �,'v, ° aitd minor overexcavation�have removed the contamination source from the soil Dissolved <br /> Vey'�lhydrocarbons in groundwater have declined significantly in all wells MTBE is present in <br /> 'groundwater beneath the site, but has generally declined and is currently only marginally above <br /> the secondary MCL in well MW-1 (6 0 ppb in March 2002), is below the MCL for wells MW3 <br /> and MW4, and is below the laboratory detection limit in well MW2 Contaminant <br /> • concentrations in groundwater and soil are expected to continue to decline through natural <br /> attenuation <br /> However, to address your concerns we modeled the transport of dissolved contaminants from <br /> the source area to the downgradient facility well and also to the nearest upgradient domestic <br /> well For the groundwater transport modeling it was assumed that the hydraulic conductivity of <br /> the aquifer is 10.2 cm/sec, the hydraulic gradient is 0 001, the plume width at the source area is <br /> 60 feet, the vertical groundwater mixing zone is 8 feet, the distance from source to receptor is <br /> 190 feet to the facility well and 80 feet to the domestic well, effective porosity of the aquifer <br /> material is 35%, the organic carbon content of the aquifer material is 0 1%, contaminants <br /> disperse with transport and the contaminants decay at the first order rates estimated by Howard <br /> The source zone concentrations (mean concentrations in MW I) and predicted concentrations at <br /> the receptor wells are summarized below <br /> Compound Source Conc Facility Well Conc Domestic Well Conc <br /> Benzene 1 7 ppb 0 024 ppb 0 32 ppb <br /> Toluene 0 8 ppb 4 0 E-13 ppb 6 5 E-8 ppb <br /> Ethybenzene 13 4 ppb 9 7 E-5 ppb 0 034 ppb <br /> Xylenes 117 ppb 0 0039 ppb 0 29 ppb <br /> MTBE 8 6 ppb 0 037 ppb 1 0 ppb <br /> G 1Data1GROUNDZEChifiBoy\Corresp10902gpsrevd doc <br />