Laserfiche WebLink
Ms Jennifer Sedlachek, Ex-10Nlobil - 2 - • 25 October 2006 <br /> 75 Alpine Avenue. Stockton <br /> immediately west of the Site and the child daycare center, which could be <br /> accomplished by using the existing soil and groundwater data. <br /> 3. The deeper monitoring wells may be installed in a second phase after the groundwater <br /> flow direction and gradient are documented by the first phase of shallow monitoring <br /> wells. <br /> Since submittal of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment on 24 August 2006. the <br /> eastern half of the Site has been developed and is now a landscaped, fenced and a raised <br /> paved area extending into the parking lot for the church/child care center. A fence separates <br /> the residence to the west from the parking lot. The western half of the Site remains <br /> undeveloped and controlled by the owner of the residence. although there was a For Sale sign <br /> for the property in September 2006. Due to the proximity of sensitive receptors, expediting the <br /> soil vapor intrusion investigation to provide the data for the risk assessment is a high priority <br /> for Regional Board staff. Mr Moise, ETIC and I also discussed the analytical methods and the <br /> investigation in the waste oil tank area. Please review Table 2 (enclosed) for the analyses. All <br /> work shall be done in accordance with Appendix A — Reports; Tri-Regional Board Staff <br /> Recommendations for Preliminary Investigations and Evaluation of Underground Tank Sites. <br /> dated 16 April 2004, which is available through the website listed in the header of this letter. <br /> The Workplan is approved with the following modifications: <br /> 1 All proposed monitoring and vapor wells shall be relocated within the constraints of the <br /> recent Site development to the greatest extent possible, by 29 December 2006. <br /> 2. Up to two additional soil vapor wells shall also be installed by 29 December 2006. to <br /> provide vapor migration data at the Site property boundaries for the risk assessment. <br /> Suggested additional locations are: the eastern boundary of the eastern half of the Site <br /> along EI Dorado Street, and the northern boundary of the western half of the Site, <br /> adjacent to the church/daycare center parking lot. <br /> 3. A Report of the investigation and the risk assessment will be submitted by <br /> 23 February 2007. A new Figure showing the actual locations of all wells and borings <br /> will be included in the Report. <br /> 4 The report shall include a conclusions and recommendations section for deeper borings <br /> and monitoring wells, to determine vertical extent of groundwater pollution. The deeper <br /> wells shall be installed no later than the 27 April 2007, with a report of the vertical <br /> delineation of the pollution due by 29 June 2007- <br /> 5. All requests for extensions shall be in writing, include a chronology of events and <br /> attempts to procure rights of entry and drilling contracts or other extenuating <br /> circumstances, and include a new schedule to conduct the work. <br /> 6. The EPA protocol allows BTEX to be analyzed for with EPA SW-86 Method 82060B or <br /> 8021 B. however. 8260B has lower detection limits, is subject to less interference in <br /> highly contaminated groundwater, and tends to be more economical by providing BTEX <br /> and MtBE data in the same analysis. Concerns about co-elution with some alkanes <br /> requires at least one confirmatory analysis with SW-86 Method 8260 per site. BTEX by <br /> Method 8021 is not capable of confirming the chemical identity of the analyte without at <br /> least one confirmatory analysis with SW-86 Method 8260 per site. <br />