My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALPINE
>
1235
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543389
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2018 8:34:38 PM
Creation date
11/1/2018 10:32:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0543389
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004512
FACILITY_NAME
MAJOR STATIONS
STREET_NUMBER
1235
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ALPINE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
11533055
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1235 E ALPINE AVE
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
321
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> Neumiller & BeardsIee <br /> FOUNDED AS A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION - - <br /> ws►rLEr a NEUM1LLEwATTOM'TUYS AND COUNSELORS MAKING ADDRESS: <br /> P.O. DRAWER 20 <br /> JANUARY 1003 li STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA 05201-9978 - <br /> FIFTH FLOOR WATERFRONT OFFICE TOWER 12091 Sae-az00 <br /> 509 WEST WEBER AVENUE <br /> STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA 95202 <br /> } <br /> January .26 , 19901 <br /> I� <br /> Charles H. Pomeroy, Esq. <br /> Groveman & Young <br /> 10 Universal City Plaza <br /> Suite 1930 <br /> Universal City, California 91608-1097: <br /> Re: Conrady, Marjorie Ann/Foreclosure <br /> ,.I <br /> File No15380-13889l <br /> Dear Mr. Pomeroy: <br /> I have received your letter of January 17, 1990 regard-�� <br /> ing the Major Mart site in Stockton. I wanted to clarify one <br /> thing in your letter which is not entirely,1accurate . I did <br /> not agree that my client would contribute fifty percent of <br /> all site assessment costs . I' indicated that I would recom- <br /> mend that to her, and that I believed she would do so based <br /> upon her past agreement to do so. At the present time my <br /> client is considering the 50/50 split„'�and., we will be respond- <br /> ing very shortly. <br /> le <br /> In the meantime, I have obtained the enclosed estimate <br />` for a preliminary site assessment from'�Leedshill--Herkenhoff, <br /> and engineering firm familiar with thelssite. Please note <br /> that their proposal does not include tank removal, which we <br /> believe is premature at this time. Leedshill-Herkenhoff did <br /> discuss this site with Tom Peltier of the Regional Board, and <br /> such aro osal would be acceptable.P P P +' <br /> Please let me know if you have any questions. I hope to <br /> be back to you with an affirmative response early next week. <br /> Thank you for your .cooperation. <br /> Y <br /> it <br /> very truly yours , <br /> li <br /> i4 I <br /> EANNE M. WLEZ <br /> Attorney-at-Law <br /> cc: Mrs:-.,Marjorie Ann Conrady <br /> Mr. Robert Allen <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.