My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LINDSAY
>
1533
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0521335
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2019 11:38:01 AM
Creation date
11/1/2018 11:02:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0521335
PE
2227
FACILITY_ID
FA0003749
FACILITY_NAME
SJ REGIONAL TRANSIT
STREET_NUMBER
1533
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LINDSAY
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
952054498
APN
15302004
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1533 E LINDSAY ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\L\LINDSAY\1533\PR0521335\COMPLIANCE INFO 2000-2009.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2000-2009
QuestysRecordDate
3/24/2016 5:51:06 PM
QuestysRecordID
3038131
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
555
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• i <br /> diagrams to illustrate the basis of generation source reduction measures which will be taken <br /> including a listing of all input materials which by the generator with respect to each hazardous <br /> contribute to the generation of hazardous or waste stream identified in subsection(h)of this <br /> extremely hazardous waste(this is not meant to section. The specification should include at a <br /> be a mass balance). minimum,a narrative description of the factors <br /> 0)An evaluation of source reduction measures in subsection(k)of this section and also address <br /> available to the generator which are potentially system capacity and efficiency. Photographs, <br /> viable.The evaluation shall consider at least all illustrations, figures or data should be used to <br /> of the following approaches: convey an understanding of the source reduction <br /> (1)Input changes. measure in sufficient detail to allow transfer of <br /> the measure to other generators with similar <br /> (2)Operational improvement. processes or procedures. <br /> (3)Production process changes. (n) An evaluation, and, to the extent <br /> (4)Product reformulation. practicable,a qualification of the effects of any <br /> (5) Administrative steps taken to reduce source reduction measure selected in subsection <br /> hazardous waste generation including but not (m)on emissions and discharges to air,water,or <br /> limited to: land. <br /> (A)Inventory control; (o)A list of each measure considered but not <br /> (B)Employee award programs; selected for a detailed evaluation as a potentially <br /> viable source reduction measure. For each <br /> (C)Employee training; measure rejected, explain the generator's <br /> (D)In-house policies; rationale. This list shall be supplemented for <br /> (E)Corporate or management commitment; waste streams where no measures were identified <br /> and with a narrative demonstrating the good faith <br /> (F)Other programs or measures. efforts undertaken to identify measures. <br /> (k)Consideration of the following factors for (p) A timetable for making reasonable and <br /> each measure evaluated in accordance with measurable progress towards implementation of <br /> subsection 0) of this section (where a specific the selected source reduction measures specified <br /> factor does not apply identify as N/A): in subsection (m) of this section. It shall also <br /> include an implementation schedule for <br /> (1) Expected change in the amount of completing the evaluation of potentially viable <br /> hazardous waste generated; source reduction measures and it shall prioritize <br /> (2)Technical feasibility; processes and wastes for future research, <br /> (3)Economic evaluation: development and source reduction analysis. <br /> (A) Capital cost, operating cost, waste (q)All plans prepared after January 1, 1993 <br /> management cost; shall contain a four-year numerical goal for <br /> (B)Return on investment(ROI),breakdown reducing the generation of hazardous waste <br /> point, avoided cost, pretax payback period, or streams through the selected source reduction <br /> any other economic comparison method; measures specified in subsection (m) of this <br /> section. <br /> (4)Effects on product quality; <br /> (5)Employee health and safety implications; 67100.7.Report. <br /> (6)Permits,variances,compliance schedules (a)On orbefore September 1,1991,and every <br /> or applicable state local and federal agencies; four years thereafter that hazardous or extremely <br /> (7)Releases and discharges. hazardous waste generation exceeds the <br /> (1)Any pertinent information,such as waste thresholds in section 67100.2(a) of these <br /> stream constituents and concentration of regulations, each generator shall prepare a <br /> constituents,needed to evaluate and implement hazardous waste managementperformancereport <br /> source reduction measures. pursuant to section 67100.8 of these regulations. <br /> (m)A specification of,and a rationale for,the (b)Except as provided in sections 67100.2(h) <br /> technically feasible and economically practicable and 67100.2(i)ofthese regulations,the hazardous <br /> 79 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.