Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> Regarding groundwater gradient and flow direction, Figure 3 presents a graphical interpretation <br /> of the data obtained by measurement of water levels in all monitoring wells and conversion of <br /> the depth-to-water measurements to Mean Sea Level (MSL) elevations The groundwater <br /> gradient is approximately 0 0067 feet per foot and the flow direction is generally toward the <br />' south and east. The flow direction is consistent with that most commonly observed at the site <br /> during previous sampling events <br />' With the flow direction generally south and east, monitor well MW-5 continues to provide <br /> groundwater quality data downgradient from the former tank site While low concentrations of <br /> benzene were seen in this well during the first three quarters of monitoring (October 1992 <br /> through March 1993), benzene has not been detected during the last two quarters which <br /> continues to indicate there is no discernable migration from the site <br />' Because the depth to groundwater varied significantly at the site over the history of the project <br /> and the relationship of groundwater depth to hydrocarbon residues in the soils is an issue of <br /> interest to potential future remedial activities, Figure 4 presents a chronology of MSL water <br />' levels at monitor well MW-2 Well MW-2 has been selected to represent water levels at the site <br /> due to its central location <br /> As shown by Figure 4, the groundwater level at the site steadily rose approximately 12 feet <br /> between October 1992 and June 1993. As the groundwater levels have been reasonably stable <br /> over the past three quarters at levels significantly higher than the lowest level recorded in late <br /> 1992, it is important to note that groundwater chemical concentrations have not increased along <br /> with the using groundwater levels This continuing lack of correlation adds confidence to the <br /> belief that either no hydrocarbons are bound up in the soils of the previously saturated zone or, <br />' if they do exist, they are not being mobilized <br /> 3.0 REMEDIAL PROGRAM STATUS <br /> As noted in the "Future Planned Activities" section of the 1st Quarter 1993 Report, continued <br />' future quarterly monitoring was anticipated to provide seasonal data on groundwater quality, <br /> depth and direction for the purposes of evaluating remedial needs The relationship between <br /> groundwater quality and depth is particularly important now that groundwater at the site has <br />' risen without producing higher chemical concentrations It is therefore increasingly unlikely that <br /> hydrocarbons are present or mobile in the previously saturated zone This data suggests that <br /> remediation of the previous saturated zone is unnecessary and that the primary environmental <br /> issue at the site is solely groundwater quality in a limited area near the center of the site <br /> San Joaquin County EHD has asked that feasibility work be conducted toward development of <br />' a remedial plan for the site by April 25, 1994 be conducted Planning is now under way to <br /> determine which issues, if any, need to be addressed <br /> 6 oviv9a <br />' STK RPTSIAREWQTR WP <br />