Laserfiche WebLink
The last area inspected was the northem-most part of the facility, near the fence <br /> line. Here we examined their hazardous waste storage area, as well as the trailer- <br /> type unit that holds all of the facility's spill containment equipment and supplies. <br /> This was the last area photographed. <br /> With the physical inspection completed, we proceeded to the office to perform the <br /> paperwork review. Mr. Trevena examined the personnel training records, and <br /> although they appeared more complete than in the last inspection, they still lacked <br /> necessary components. Mr. Trevena reviewed the applicable section in Title 22 <br /> with Mr. Wilkinson and Mr. Kyle, and they both indicated they understood the <br /> deficiencies and what was needed to correct them. Mr. Trevena also examined <br /> the facility contingency plan and their City of Stockton wastewater discharge <br /> permit, showing an expiration date of 12-31-93. Mr. Kyle indicated they retrieve a <br /> sample for analysis each time they discharge into the sewer, and they had not <br /> been recently inspected by City of Stockton Municipal Utilities. <br /> I reviewed the manifests for all hazardous waste shipped off-site in 1992. I <br /> noticed a significant increase in the amount of waste generated for 1992 from the <br /> previous two years. Mr. Kyle explained to me that the aboveground tank cleaning <br /> process produces a large amount of petroleum/water waste. This operation will <br /> occur at least once per tank every five years, but may arise more frequently if the <br /> product being stored in the tank has to be modified. For this particular year, tank <br /> #6 was cleaned, as well as maintenance performed on the oil/water separator, <br /> thus correlating to the substantial increase in this wastestream for 1992. Due to <br /> the high variability in the quantity produced from this wastestream, it will be <br /> necessary to closely scrutinize, on an annual basis, the amount produced as to <br /> accurately classify TOC in the PHS/EHD generator program. <br /> IX DISCUSSION WITH MANAGEMENT: <br /> Mr. Trevena and I informed Mr. Wilkinson and Mr. Kyle that the only violation <br /> noted was the inadequate training records. Mr. Wilkinson stated he would be <br /> working on correcting this violation immediately and would forward to PHS/EHD <br /> the completed documentation for our review. <br /> I asked Mr. Kyle about the status of TOC's Permit by Rule, now known as Tiered <br /> Permitting application process. He indicated that I would need to contact Mr. <br /> Don Butler, Environmental Specialist for TOC in the Seattle office, to acquire <br /> that information. <br /> With the inspection completed, Mr. Trevena and I left the premises at 2:30 p.m. <br /> X. ADDENDUM: <br /> On August 9, 1993, I received documentation from Mr. Wilkinson demonstrating <br /> that the personnel training records had been revised to comply with Title 22 <br /> requirements. <br /> 5 <br />