My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ARGONAUT
>
1819
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508343
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2018 1:27:56 AM
Creation date
11/1/2018 4:29:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0508343
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0008041
FACILITY_NAME
JOHN TAYLOR - STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
1819
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
ARGONAUT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16320008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1819 S ARGONAUT ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br />Mr. Eric Jenks - 3 - 9 July 2003 <br />because the related gasoline constituents BTEX and MTBE are included in the volatile organic <br />compound suite using EPA Method 8260B. If these compounds are detected in the monitoring <br />wells, then JTF may be requested to also analyze groundwater for TPH as gasoline. <br />Any new monitoring wells installed subsequent to the issuance of the MRP must be monitored <br />quarterly for all constituents identified in the MRP for at least four consecutive quarters, then <br />semi-annually. If no compounds in any specific analytical suite are detected in the first year, then <br />that suite of compounds may be removed from the monitoring schedule for that well with staff <br />concurrence. The draft MRP reflects these changes and is attached for your review and <br />comment. <br />Monitoring Reports <br />The monitoring reports are complete and well organized. The figures portray the data in a format <br />that is easily interpreted. <br />The First QMR, which is the most recent monitoring report, includes a change in the format of <br />the analytical data table. In this report, the data table does not show all the analytical suites that <br />JTF routinely monitors. The organophosphate suite of compounds, TPH as gas, TPH as diesel, <br />and ammonium are regularly analyzed but have not been detected. It is significant that these <br />compounds are not detected, and this should be illustrated in the table. Please restore the results <br />of these analyses to the data tables in future monitoring reports. <br />Data Gaps <br />JTF is closing the data gap relating to off-site migration of constituents as discussed above. <br />Other data gaps that need to be closed before the extent of pollution is determined relate to <br />upgradient water quality and groundwater in the operations area. <br />Upgradient MW -3 contains nitrate at about 130 mg/l, bromacil at about 6 ug/l, and dinoseb at <br />about 1.3 ug/1. While this is the most upgradient well at the facility, the detected constituents <br />suggest that an additional monitoring well is needed that is far enough upgradient to characterize <br />water quality unaffected by site operations. A grab groundwater sample obtained near the <br />upgradient corner of the property in 1999 contained nitrate at about 200 mg/l. JTF and Board <br />staff need to have a good understanding of whether there is an off-site source contributing to the <br />nitrate, bromacil and dinoseb detected on-site. <br />The monitoring well network surrounds the site and identifies constituents that could be <br />migrating off-site. The 1999 and 2000 grab groundwater investigation identified constituents in <br />the operations areas that have not been detected in the monitoring wells. These constituents <br />include MTBE, toluene, xylene, TPH diesel, atrazine, dacthal, and dicamba. JTF should propose <br />additional wells within the operations area of the facility to identify the constituents that are of <br />concern on-site and whether future remediation efforts are effective. JTF should include this <br />proposal in the downgradient investigative results report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.