Laserfiche WebLink
07/21/95 TUE 14:11 FAX GROUNDWATER <br />r d'� <br />FLUOR DANIEL *'7b <br />July21, 1998 <br />Mr. Michael WO <br />San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br />304 E. Weber Avenue, 3rd door <br />Stockton, California 95202 <br />Subject: Soil Disposal and Excavation <br />Southland 7 -Eleven Store # 14117 <br />2725 Country Club Boulevard <br />Stockton, California <br />Mr. Kith: <br />As requested, Fluor Daniel GTE, Inc. submits this letter to document the transportation and disposal of tank <br />overburden soil generated during the removal of the three 10,000-galian underground storage tanks <br />(USTs) at the subject site_ In additon, this letter addresses the additional soil excavated from the bottom of <br />the UST excavation. <br />On July 15 and 16, 1996, approximately 278 tons of LIST overburden sol was removed from the subject <br />site- The sail was transported prior to the tank removal due to site constraints which made it difficult for tie <br />contractorto continue working. The soil was loaded onto trucks operated by Cross Trucking of Forestville, <br />CA (Haz Mat # 3250) working as a subcontractor for Belshire Environmental of Lake Forest, CQ The soil <br />was hauled under a non -hazardous waste rnantestto T.P.S. Technologies, Inc. in Richmond, CA for <br />proper treatment and disposal (See attached). <br />Upon arrival of the soil to T.P.S., one sal sample was collected from the from the 278 tons of soil by T.P.S. <br />personnel and submitted to Weck Laboratories, Inc- in Industry, California frit analysis. The sample was <br />analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes (BTEC, methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE), total <br />petroleum hydrocarbons-a"asoline CTPH G), and total petroleum hydrocarbons -as -diesel (iPH-D). <br />BTEX and MTBE were not detected in the sample collected (soil sample ID 9818258). TPH-G and TPH-D <br />were detected at r oro ntralions of 152 mUft and 42.9 mg/kg, respectively (See attached). <br />The reason for transpo ng the soil prig, to sampling was to respond quickly to the contractors request to <br />remove the soil due to site constraints. Since hydrocarbort4mpacted sob is very rarely handled as <br />hazardous waste, the soil was transported under a non -hazardous waste manifest. <br />An additional 40 cubic yards of sail was excavated frorn tie bottom of the lank pit following the removal of <br />USTs. The soil was excavated to allow for the placement of two feet of solid base rock beneath the water <br />in the tank pit far snit compaction purposes only. The soil was not excavated for the purposes of removing <br />hydrocarhan-impacted soil. The deavon to excavate the bottom of the former tank pit was made by the <br />757 Arnold Drive, Suite D / Mudinez, CA 94553 USA (51C) 37x3990 FAX (510) 3703991 <br />0 <br />I;1002 <br />