Laserfiche WebLink
Unitized Systems -Engineerinle <br /> 0 Page 2 of 4 <br /> 42,500 simply because that was all the concentrated weight <br /> available at the time of UL field testing. This load capacity is <br /> significantly more magnitude than can be expected by any typical <br /> canopy, even in the geographical areas subject to heavy snow <br /> loads. <br /> IL Impact Forces: The Tank is designed to withstand the impact <br /> of heavy vehicle on a canopy column which is connected to the <br /> PetroFirst Tank. The impact analysis was conducted following the <br /> design specification by the American Association of State <br /> Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO). The selected <br /> force/load criteria is based on a severe impact scenario, one that <br /> may occur however it is unlikely to occur at a service station <br /> facility given the type of traffic, speed, and controlled <br /> accessibility. (i.e. Heavy truck type vehicle, traveling at 30 Mph, <br /> striking the column at vehicle bumper height.) To further preclude <br /> the unlikely possibly of a larger impact force being transferred to <br /> the Tank, the column connection has a patented impact relief <br /> feature, which will allow a separation(disconnect) of the column <br /> connection bolts from the Tank if subjected to an impact of a <br /> larger magnitude than identified above. <br /> III. External Hydrostatic Pressure. The Tank is designed to <br /> withstand the hydrostatic effects on an empty tank which is <br /> completely submerged in water to a depth of 5 ft. over the top of <br /> the Tank. The analysis identifies the Tank can withstand this <br /> maximum hydraulic head pressure (13 ft.) when the Tank is <br /> structurally supported (internal stiffeners) at points not more than <br /> 35 ft. apart along the length of the Tank. In the case of the <br /> PetroFirst Tank, there are several points where additional internal <br /> stiffeners are placed to accommodate product compartments <br /> and/or column supports stiffeners,therefore distortion of the Tank, <br /> due to hydrostatic pressure, is not a significant design concern. <br /> IV. Stability Analysis: The Tank stability analysis identifies there <br /> is no potential for Tank overturning once installed underground <br /> and backfilled including the worst case loading condition when <br /> the Tank is subjected to loading in a eccentric application. <br /> T ,r <br /> It should be noted the design calculations were indeed <br /> conservative due to the fact the longitudinal trough on top of the <br /> PetroFirst Tank was not considered as a resistance to overturning. <br /> The trough in reality generates a significant resistance, acting <br /> similar to a key way on a shaft, which in this application will <br /> http://www.plasteel.com/pfeng.html 8/28/200 <br />