COMPLIANCE INFO 1999-2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

D. Resultsof'1'esting/Servicing Software Version Installed: ---L2i. _ Ves ❑ No* Is the visual alarm lope rauuua. -- Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visual) ins ected, functional) testeJ, and confinired o erational7 Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their ro er o eration? Yes ❑ J>le" 1f alarms are relayed to a remote mmtitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) C'l N/A operational? Yes O No* For pressurizer) piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut -down? (Check all dmr apply) ajulop/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser r Containment nt Sensors. Did ou confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection. Yes ❑ No* For lank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device he. no O N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible end audible at the % fill oint(s) and o eratin ro erl ? If so, at what ercent of tank capacity does the alarm tri _, Yes* B"Flo Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all re lacement arts in Section E, below. Yes*o Was liquid (Quad inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ Product; ❑ Water. if yes, describe causes in Section E, below. —t_aa reviewed to ensure proper settings) Attach set up reports e if applicabl Yes ❑ No* I is all monitorm e m 3111CIlL -• - ---- * [n Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. E. Comments: - - —_ — 03081 Page 2 of 'r