Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB, January 2002 0 <br />4. TANK ANNULAR `ITEST1NG <br />0 Page ` of <br />Test Method Developed By: ❑ Tank Manufacturer ❑ Industry Standard G Professional Engineer <br />x Other (Specify) County Protocol <br />Test Method Used: G Pressure X Vacuum ❑ Hydrostatic <br />D Other (Spec) <br />Test Fquipment Used: Marsh P0105 Equipment Resolution: .01 <br />Tani, 4 <br />Tank #T-4 Tank # <br />Tank # _ <br />Is Tank Exempt From Testing'?� <br />I C Yes x No <br />❑ Yes ❑ No <br />❑ Yes J No <br />J Yes Ll No <br />Tank Capacity: <br />2,000 <br />Tank Material: <br />Plasteel <br />'tank Manufacturer: <br />Trusco <br />Product Stored: <br />Used Oil <br />Wait time between applying <br />pressurelvacuumlwater and <br />starting test: <br />30 Minutes <br />Test Start Time: <br />1 2:40 <br />Initial Reading (R,): <br />-10.0 <br />Test End Time: <br />3:40 <br />Final Reading (RF): <br />-10.0 <br />Test Duration: <br />1 Hour <br />Change in Reading (RF-Rj): <br />0.00 <br />Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: <br />.001 <br />Test Result: <br />x Pass ❑ Fail <br />❑ pass ❑ Fail <br />0 Pass ❑ Fail <br />❑ Pass ❑ Fail <br />Was sensor removed for testing? <br />x Yes ❑ No ❑ NA <br />C7 Yes ❑ No C NA <br />E Yes E No ❑ NA <br />U Ycs []No U NA <br />Was sensor properly replaced and <br />verified functional after testing? <br />x Yes ❑ NoJNA <br />r7 Yes C No a NA <br />❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes E No [INA <br />Comments — (inchrde information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended follow -u for ailed tests) <br />' Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary <br />containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment <br />testing. ',California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) <br />