My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2016-2018
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
1630
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0518624
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2016-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 11:13:49 AM
Creation date
11/5/2018 11:20:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2016-2018
RECORD_ID
PR0518624
PE
2371
FACILITY_ID
FA0024496
FACILITY_NAME
Costco Wholesale #38 (Gas Station)
STREET_NUMBER
1630
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
Ln
City
Stockton
Zip
95210
APN
09428011
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1630 E Hammer Ln
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HAMMER\1630\PR0518624\COMPLIANCE INFO 2016-PRESENT .PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ALGtIVED <br /> Facility Name: Costco # 038 Stockton (Page 2) MAR 16 2016 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Comtete the followin checklist: <br /> Software the <br /> Installed: 333.04 <br /> ®Yes Li No Is the audible alarm o erational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ®Yes ElNo* Is the print function operational? <br /> ®Yes ElNo* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed o erational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other <br /> e ui ment will not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ®Yes El No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. <br /> ❑ N/A modem) operational? <br /> ®Y ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary <br /> ❑ N/A containment monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If <br /> yes: which sensors initiate positive shutdown? (Check all that apply) ® Sump Sensors; <br /> Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shutdown due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ® Yes; ❑ No. <br /> H-s- <br /> ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device, is <br /> ❑ N/A the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? At <br /> what percent of tank capacity does the alarm tri er? 90% <br /> Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other <br /> equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section <br /> E, below. <br /> ®Yes* ❑ No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check a// <br /> that apply)❑ Product; ® Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br /> Yes No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if <br /> a I'cable <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment oerational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> 7. Comments: There was a small amount of liquid found in the 87b fill sump from condensation build up. <br /> There was also a small amount of brine at the bottom of the additive Fill/STP. Inspected inside of sump and <br /> found no visible leaks. Brine must have been spillage from a technician filling the resevoir. <br /> s> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.