Laserfiche WebLink
SWRCB,January 2002 Page �C, of <br /> 8. FILL,RISER CONTAINMENT SUMS'TESTING <br /> Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps <br /> Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present, but were Not Tested ❑ <br /> -Test Method Developed By: ❑Sump Manufacturer ❑Industry Standard ❑Professiopel Engineer / <br /> `� ❑Other(Spec) j <br /> Test Methoilwiised: El Pressure ❑Vacuum 11 Hydrostatic <br /> ~�` ❑Other(.5peci.fi') <br /> Test Equipment Used: Equipment Ices an <br /> Fill Sum # Fill Sum # Fill Su ukd# Fill Sump# <br /> Sum Diameter: <br /> Sump Depth: <br /> Height from Tank Top to Top of <br /> Highest Piping Penetration: `4 ,f <br /> Height from Tank Top to Lowest r' <br /> Electrical Penetration: <br /> Condition of sump prior to <br /> Portion of Sump Tested <br /> Sum Material: z <br /> Wait time between applying ° <br /> pressure/vacuum/water and <br /> starting test: N11'N. <br /> Test Start Time: <br /> Initial Reading(RI): <br /> Test End Time: <br /> Final Reading RF): <br /> Test Duration: <br /> Change in Reading(RF-9i): <br /> Pass/Fail Threshold pyCriteria. <br /> Test Result: ❑ Pass ❑Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑Fail NPass ❑Fail <br /> Is there a sensor)6 the sump? ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No ❑Yes ❑No ❑ s Q No <br /> Does the-sens alarm when <br /> either prod94or water is ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑ o ❑NA <br /> detected? y <br /> Was se or removed for testing? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No --.❑NA <br /> Was se sor properly replaced and <br /> verified functional after testing? ❑ yes ❑No DNA ❑Yes ❑Na ❑NA ❑Yes ❑No 11NA ❑Yes ElNo ❑NA <br /> Comments— (include information on repairs made prior to-testing, and recommended follow-up for failed tests) <br />