Laserfiche WebLink
Horner Ezy Chek System <br />TEST DATA d RESULTS OF TESTS <br />OWNER/OPERATOR T.ihhy—nmens—Ford n1 -ca TANK LOCATION Rant of plant <aact rank <br />Company <br />AGENT Rnn Tnnpc AGENT icon Onick <br />ADDRESS snn F. T.nniaa a„e ..o ADDRESS <br />CITY, STATET.arhrnp, CA 9S'130 CITY, STA <br />TELEPHONE (209)--858-5151 TELEPHONE ( ) <br />SCHEDULED DATE OF TEST 7-21-86 SCHEDULED ARRIVAL TIME <br />TEST TANK PRODUCT WATER TEST INCHES ABOVE <br />/ CAPACITY CONTAINED PRESENT RESULTS TANK TOP <br />1� <br />5aQQQ--- Unlead,_Gaso_ _.3L4”+_143 2�"_ - <br />2- 5000__Unlead_Gaso. -3/4" -.1164 79__-_ <br />10:00 P.M <br />WITHIN NFPA <br />GUIDELINES <br />OF .O5 <br />No - <br />0000504k I <br />-N- -- <br />REMARKSBased upon results obtained previously, tank only was tested first. <br />The results and graph indicate that a vapor pocket exists in ---tli—etank. The <br />gain shown is beyond the parameters to positively state that the tank is <br />tight as the vapor pocket could be masking a eahowever, t en cation <br />is that the tank is not leaking. <br />Test two results reflect a loss of product, and may well be a true <br />indication of the tank and system condition; however, based upon the results <br />from test one, the results may be caused by the height pressure collapsing <br />the vapor pocket. In either case, the tank needs to be uncovered down to <br />tank top, a visual inspection made of a 1in�nd, in aii probability—, <br />retested for integrity while uncovered. <br />TESTING CONTRACTOR: Integrity Tank Testing Systems, Inc. <br />166 Frank West Circle, Stockton, Ca. 95206 <br />1 800 262 8378 <br />CONTRACTORS TECHNICIAN L�JC1 <br />• <br />DATE OF TEST 7-96-96W. Savage <br />