My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2003
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
4855
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0506650
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:12 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 8:15:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1998-2003
RECORD_ID
PR0506650
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007571
FACILITY_NAME
ARCH ARCO AM PM*
STREET_NUMBER
4855
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
17926051
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4855 S HWY 99
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\HWY 99\4855\PR0506650\COMPLIANCE INFO 1998-2003.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 3 � S 153 <br /> Site Address: SS#6335,4855 South State Route 99,Stockton Date of <br /> F. In-Tank Gauging/ SIR Equipment: ❑ eck this box if tank gauging is used only for inventory control. <br /> Check this box if no tank gauging or SIR equipment is installed. <br /> This section must be completed if in-tank gauging equipment is used to perform leak detection monitoring. <br /> Cing checklist: <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Has all input wiring been inspected for proper entry and termination,including testing for ground faults? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Were all tank gauging probes visually inspected for damage and residue buildup? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Was accuracy of system product level readings tested? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Was accuracy of system water level readings tested? <br /> ET Yes ❑ No* Were all probes reinstalled properly? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* Were all items on the equipment manufacturer's maintenance checklist completed? <br /> *In the Section H,below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> G. Line Leak Detectors (LLD): ❑ Check this box if LLDs are not installed. <br /> ;EJ/Yes <br /> e the following checklist: <br /> ❑ No For equipment start-up or annual equipment c ' ication, was a leak simulated to verify LLD performance? <br /> ❑ N/A (Check all that apply) Simulated leak rate: g.p.h.'; ❑0.1 g.p.h.2; ❑0.2 g.p.h.Z <br /> Notes: 1. Required for equipment start-up certification and annual certification. <br /> 2. Unless mandated by local agency,certification required only for electronic LLD start-up. <br /> S ❑ No* Were all LLDs confirmed operational and accurate within regulatory requirements? <br /> ❑ No Was the testing apparatus properly calibrated? <br /> ❑ No* For mechanical LLDs,does the LLD restrict product flow if it detects a leak? <br /> ❑ N/A <br /> Yes ❑ No* For electronic LLDs,does the turbine automatically shut off if the LLD detects a leak? <br /> ❑ N/A <br /> Y s ❑ No* For electronic LLDs, does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system is disabled <br /> ❑ N/A or disconnected? <br /> Y s ❑ No* For electronic LLDs,does the turbine automatically shut off if any portion of the monitoring system malfunctions <br /> ❑ N/A or fails a test? <br /> Ej Ye C1 No* For electronic LLDs,have all accessible wiring connections been visually inspected? <br /> ❑ N/A <br /> Yes ❑ No* Were all items on the equipment manufacturer's maintenance checklist completed? <br /> *In the Section H,below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> H. Comments: <br /> Page 3 of 3 03101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.