My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REMOVAL_1986
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
2941
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0503538
>
REMOVAL_1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 2:22:23 PM
Creation date
11/5/2018 9:11:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
REMOVAL
FileName_PostFix
1986
RECORD_ID
PR0503538
PE
2381
FACILITY_ID
FA0009657
STREET_NUMBER
2941
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206-1149
APN
48906-1
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2941 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\N\NAVY\2941\PR0503538\REMOVAL 1986 .PDF
QuestysFileName
REMOVAL 1986
QuestysRecordDate
10/3/2017 5:24:38 PM
QuestysRecordID
3659638
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> i <br /> ST Services ST Services <br /> a GRACE company 17000 Dallas Parkway, Suite 223 <br /> Dallas, Texas 75248 <br /> (214) 931-8065 <br /> November 3, 1986 <br /> Dir C. Leland Hall <br /> Director (� <br /> Environmental Health Division NOV ] �ytSb <br /> San Joaquin Local Health District <br /> 1601 East Hazeltin Avenue <br /> P. 0. sox 2009 ENVIROMENTAL HEALTH <br /> Stockton, CA 95201 PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> RE: UNDERGROUND TANK REMOVAL PROJECT <br /> Dear Mr. Hall: <br /> This letter responds to your letter to us dated October 24, 1986 <br /> concerning analytical results from soil sampling conducted by our consultant, <br /> Weiss Associates in May 1986. At our request, our consultant provided you with <br /> these test results in June 1986. <br /> At the outset, we believe that it is important to correct certain <br /> misstatements contained in your letter of October 24. First, we believe that <br /> analytical results from a single soil sample do not provide an adequate basis for <br /> concluding whether an "unauthorized release" has occurred. Furthermore, we <br /> do not believe that the analytical results on this soil sample demonstrate a <br /> "violation" of the California Health and Safety Code, the California Water Code <br /> or their implementing regulations. <br /> As required by these statutory and regulatory programs, we reported this <br /> information to you four months ago and requested guidance on the appropriate <br /> course of action. In the interim, we have been ready, willing and able to <br /> conduct any further investigation that the Health District might require. Since <br /> the Health District now appears to consider further characterization necessary, <br /> we will retain a qualified engineering consulting firm to submit a plan for <br /> identifying the extent of contamination, if any. We willsubmit our consultant's <br /> plan to the Health District no later than December 5, 1986. This plan will <br /> include both the testing proposal and a schedule of implementation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.