Laserfiche WebLink
k" KLEINFEL, DER <br /> SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS <br /> Depth from Dry Laboratory Specified <br /> Test Finished Moisture Density Compaction Relative Relative <br /> No. Date Test Location Subgrade %Dry Wt. P.C.F. Curve No. Compaction Compaction <br /> San Joaquin Delta College <br /> Tank Removal Backfill <br /> 1 11/21 center section -10.0' 15.6 107.8 1 90 90% <br /> 2 11/21 S. section -6.0' 12.7 113.7 1 95 " <br /> 3 11/21 N. section -5.0' 14.9 112.9 1 95 " <br /> 4 11/21 S. section -2.5' 8.8 110.9 1 93 " <br /> 5 11/21 NE section -1.5' 12.3 113.7 1 95 95% <br /> 6 11/21 NW section -1.5' 9.4 114.0 1 96 " <br /> 7 11/21 S. section FSG 15.5 112.7 1 95 " <br /> 8 11/21 NE section -0.5' 12.8 114.8 1 96 " <br /> 9 11/21 NW section FSG 14.1 116.1 1 97 <br /> Optimum Maximum Dry <br /> Curve No. Description Moisture (%) Density (n.c.f.) <br /> 1(import) brown fine sand 13.2 119.2 <br /> Accepted engineering and testing procedures were used for these tests. The above data is presented for information purposes only. In the absence of continuous <br /> observations of our personnel at the site,we can not express an opinion as to the adequacy of site preparation or overall fill compaction. We do not undertake the <br /> guarantee of construction, nor the eon1rador of his primary responsibilty to produce a completed project canfortrlin��t1�tfLe2projecl plans and <br /> g 1'"§p LL LL1l UU <br /> specdicaiions. <br /> R-20 <br />