Laserfiche WebLink
D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: <br />.k.l;..v. <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or wrn De correcrea. <br />E. Comments: <br />91 Pi was replaced due to failing on monitoring certification with Afford A T <br />Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4REE12107 E C <br />i3 ;'�, <br />JAN 2 4 2018 <br />ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br />DEPARTMENT 2121107 <br />X Yes <br />No' <br />Is the audible adarrn operational? <br />X Yes <br />;I No' <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />X Yes <br />No` <br />Were all sensors visually inspected. functionally tested„ and confirmed operational? <br />X Yes <br />i <br />Were ail sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their <br />proper operation? <br />X Yes <br />No' <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment qe.gmodem) operational? <br />N/A <br />X Yes <br />No` <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system <br />NIA <br />detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut -down? (Check ail that apply) <br />Sumplfrench Sensors; ,-1 Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut -dawn due to leaks and sensor <br />fail ureldi sconnection? Yes; No <br />X Yes <br />No` <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention <br />NA <br />valve Is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill points} and operating properly? if so, at what percent <br />of tank capacity does the alarm tri er? % <br />X Yes' <br />No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br />manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E. below. <br />Yes' <br />X No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) Product; Wafer. If <br />es, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />X Yes <br />No' <br />Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />X Yes <br />Ni <br />Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />* In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or wrn De correcrea. <br />E. Comments: <br />91 Pi was replaced due to failing on monitoring certification with Afford A T <br />Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4REE12107 E C <br />i3 ;'�, <br />JAN 2 4 2018 <br />ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br />DEPARTMENT 2121107 <br />