COMPLIANCE INFO_2010 REPAIR - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SWRCB,January 2002 Page 5 of 5 8.FILL RISER CONTAINMENT SUMP TESTING Facility is Not Equipped With Fill Riser Containment Sumps ❑ Fill Riser Containment Sumps are Present,but were Not Tested ❑ Test Method Developed by ❑ Sump Manufacturer ® Industry Standard ❑ Professional Engineer ❑ Other(Specify) Test Method Used ❑ Pressure ❑ Vacuum N Hydrostatic ❑ Other(Specify) Test Equipment Used:Incon TS-STS Equipment Resolution: .0006 Fill Sump#Middle Fill Sump# Fill Sump# Fill Sump# UE042UO01 UE042U001 Sump Diameter: 38" 38" Sump Depth: 41" 40.5" Height from Tank Top to Top of NIA 10" Highest Piping Penetration: Height from Tank Top to Lowest 14" 8" Electrical Penetration: Condition of sum prior to testing: Good Good Portion of Sump Tested: 2"Above Collar Sumv Material: Fiber lass Fiberglass Wait time between applying 15 Min pressure/vacuum/water and starting test: Test Start Time.. 10:20 AM 10:36 AM Initial Reading i : 2.9936 2.9938 Test End Time: 10:35 AM 10:51 AM Final Reading 2.9937 2.9935 Test Duration: 15 Min 15 Min Chanize in Reading f-Ri : .0001 .0003 Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: .002 .002 Test Result: ® Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ® FaiI ❑ Pass ❑ Fail ❑ Pass ❑ Fail Is there a sensor in the sump? ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Does the sensor alarm when either ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA roduct or water is detected? Was sensor removed for testing? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Was sensor properly replaced and ❑ NA ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA [IYes ❑ No ❑ NA verified functional after testing? Elly:111 ® No ❑ NA 11P Yes ® No Comments include any information on re airs made prior to testing,and recommended follow-up for failed tests The Middle Sump sensor were reinstalled to the lowest point,but not tested. The Fill Sump is a visual failure due to the Vent Secondary cracked test boot.Did not put any test water into the fill sump.