COMPLIANCE INFO_2010 REPAIR - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 1 of 2 Jeff Wong [EH1 From: Brown, Chris [Chris.Brown@stantec.com] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 12:04 PM To: Jeff Wong [EH] Cc: HARRELL, LARRY(ATTSI); NAUMANN,VYRL(ATTSI); Is936g@att.com; DIAZ, MARIO(ATTSI); SAINE, JOHNNY L(ATTSI); SATRE, RODRICK(ATTSI); Ric Collins Subject: FW:AT&T Facility(UE042); 345 N San Joaquin, Stockton-Piping modification/repair permit(SR0058480) Jeff, Would you please respond in writing by 03-26-10 that my understanding of your voicemail (summarized below)is correct? I require written confirmation for our records. I have no way to document your voicemail other than summarizing it and requesting confirmation from you. Thank you. Chris Brown Project Manager Stantec Ph:(707)765-1660 Ext.782 Fx:(707)765-9908 ch6s.brown@stantec.com stantec.com The oontent of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied,modified,retransmitted,or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization.If you are not the intended recipient,please delete all oopies and notify us immediately. Q Pisase consider the environment before printing this email. From: Brown, Chris Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 11:32 AM To:jwong@sicehd.corn Cc: HARRELL, LARRY(ATTSI); NAUMANN, VYRL(ATTSI); 'Is936g@att.com'; SATRE, RODRICK(ATISI); 'SAINE,JOHNNY L (ATTSI)'; DIAZ, MARIO(ATTSI); Ric Collins Subject: FW: AT&T Facility(UE042); 345 N San Joaquin, Stockton - Piping modification/repair permit(SR005t3480) Hi Jeff, Thank you for the voicemail last week in response to the e-mail below. It is my understanding from your voicemail that: 1) The statement below in bold is true. The facility is not supposed to operate without oversight and approval of the local agency; 2) The statement below in bold is typical of UST permits issued by your office and was put in there b/c gas stations were performing EVR upgrades without notifying your office. The EVR upgrades included an upgrade of the TLS-350 monitoring system software and thus required a"cold start"witnessed by an inspector from your office. 3) The statement below in bold,while true, is not directly applicable to the project at 345 N San Joaquin since the TLS-350 system is not being upgraded as part of this project and thus a"cold start"is not required. However if something happens that will cause a delay to the work or that will render the system inoperable for an extended period of time,you have asked to be kept in the loop so that a determination can be made as to whether a temporary fuel source will then be required. As I understand it,the current approved scope of work will not require a temporary fuel source, since one supply pump and one supply line as well as the tank monitoring system will be kept available for operation at all times. 3/22/2010