Laserfiche WebLink
6.0 SUMMARY/DISCUSSION OF RESULTS <br />6.1 SAMPLING SCHEME <br />The soil and groundwater sampling scheme consisted of collecting and retaining for hydrocarbon <br />constituent laboratory analyses a minimum of two soil samples per boring for borings B-1 through B-4. <br />Additional soil samples were retained if obvious signs of contamination were noted. A minimum of two <br />soil samples per boring were collected and retained for hydrocarbon constituent laboratory analyses for <br />borings B-5 through B-8. The soil samples collected from each of the borings B-5 through B-8 were <br />composited by the laboratory for analyses. The discrete samples collected from the boring with the <br />highest composite sample contaminant levels were then submitted for the same analyses. The single <br />discrete sample from borings B-1 through B-4 and the single discrete sample from borings B-5 through <br />B-8 with the highest contaminant levels were subsequently submitted for analysis for CAM 17 metals. <br />The borings in the vicinities of TK1 and TK2 with the most obvious signs of contamination were <br />advanced to groundwater and a groundwater grab sample was collected from each to be analyzed for <br />hydrocarbon constituents. A groundwater grab sample was also collected from the abandoned well to be <br />analyzed for hydrocarbon constituents. The soil samples collected from borings C-1 through C-4 were <br />analyzed for hydrocarbon constituents and total lead. <br />6.2 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS <br />Laboratory analytical results indicate that soil below approximately 16 to 20 feet bgs has not been <br />impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons at the site. Based on field observations, PID measurements, and <br />ow <br />1164) NtiiiiiI <br />CONDOR <br />• <br />•lase If Environmental <br />Site Assessment <br />Heritage Square <br />Page 7 <br />Table 3 — Laboratory Analytical Results for Phase II ESA Soil Samples <br />CAM 17 Metals (June 10 and 11, 2002) <br />Sample ID, 3572D -B3-15.5' B5-5-15.5' <br />Constituent <br />Method <br />RL (mg/kg) <br />PRG <br />6/10/02 <br />6/11/02 <br />Antimony <br />60108 <br />0.30 <br />31 <br />1.0 <br />Arsenic <br />6010B <br />0.30 <br />22 <br />1.2 <br />11 <br />6.8 <br />Barium <br />6010B <br />0.40 <br />5,400 <br />100 <br />119 <br />' Beryllium <br />60108 <br />0.40 <br />150 <br />ND <br />ND <br />Cadmium <br />60108 <br />0.15 <br />37 <br />0.60 <br />0,71 <br />Chromium <br />6010B <br />0.25 <br />210 <br />42 <br />30 <br />' Cobalt <br />6010B <br />0.25 <br />4,700 <br />13 <br />I1 <br />Copper <br />6010B <br />0.35 <br />2,900 <br />44 <br />29 <br />Lead <br />6010B <br />0.30 <br />400 <br />6.0 <br />16 <br />' Mercury <br />7471A <br />0.050 <br />23 <br />ND <br />ND <br />Molybdenum <br />60I B <br />0.25 <br />390 <br />ND <br />ND <br />Nickel <br />60106 <br />0.45 <br />1,600 <br />40 <br />31 <br />Selenium <br />60108 <br />0.30 <br />390 <br />ND <br />ND <br />. Silver <br />6010B <br />0.25 <br />390 <br />NID <br />ND <br />Thallium <br />6010B <br />0.25 <br />5.2 <br />ND <br />ND <br />Vanadium <br />6010B <br />0.25 <br />550 <br />58 <br />52 <br />- - Zinc <br />6010E <br />0.50 <br />23,000 <br />56 <br />40 <br />Notes <br />ND= constituent not detected in this sample at <br />or above the laboratory reporting limit <br />Units <br />m}/kg=milligrams per kilogram, <br />pans pennillion <br />6.0 SUMMARY/DISCUSSION OF RESULTS <br />6.1 SAMPLING SCHEME <br />The soil and groundwater sampling scheme consisted of collecting and retaining for hydrocarbon <br />constituent laboratory analyses a minimum of two soil samples per boring for borings B-1 through B-4. <br />Additional soil samples were retained if obvious signs of contamination were noted. A minimum of two <br />soil samples per boring were collected and retained for hydrocarbon constituent laboratory analyses for <br />borings B-5 through B-8. The soil samples collected from each of the borings B-5 through B-8 were <br />composited by the laboratory for analyses. The discrete samples collected from the boring with the <br />highest composite sample contaminant levels were then submitted for the same analyses. The single <br />discrete sample from borings B-1 through B-4 and the single discrete sample from borings B-5 through <br />B-8 with the highest contaminant levels were subsequently submitted for analysis for CAM 17 metals. <br />The borings in the vicinities of TK1 and TK2 with the most obvious signs of contamination were <br />advanced to groundwater and a groundwater grab sample was collected from each to be analyzed for <br />hydrocarbon constituents. A groundwater grab sample was also collected from the abandoned well to be <br />analyzed for hydrocarbon constituents. The soil samples collected from borings C-1 through C-4 were <br />analyzed for hydrocarbon constituents and total lead. <br />6.2 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS <br />Laboratory analytical results indicate that soil below approximately 16 to 20 feet bgs has not been <br />impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons at the site. Based on field observations, PID measurements, and <br />ow <br />1164) NtiiiiiI <br />CONDOR <br />