Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 5 <br /> Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:00 PM <br /> To: 'Rahul Chalke' <br /> Subject: RE: ARCO 4932: 16 E. Harding Way <br /> Good afternoon Rahul, <br /> I have a break between meetings, enough time to comment about bullets three and four in your email below. <br /> San Joaquin County records indicate that three 12,000-gallon USTs were removed in 1999. You decide whether <br /> you would like to verify this with ARCO; but unless you confirm this, I must disagree with the volume of the three <br /> USTs removed from this site. <br /> Concerning bullet four, you have MW-7 listed twice, once in the list where WQOs have been achieved and once in <br /> the list where WQOs have not been achieved; if you remove MW-7 from the list where WQOs have been <br /> achieved, and add MW-3 and EW-6 to the list where WQOs have not been achieved, then the number changes to <br /> 14, instead of 16, for the number of wells out of 29 wells where the water has achieved WQOs. <br /> I must go to my next meeting but I will be in touch later concerning your current information presented in your <br /> email below. <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue <br /> Stockton, California 95205 <br /> Phone: (209)468-9852 <br /> Email: vmccartnevCopsicehd com <br /> -y <br /> 41 � <br /> From: Rahul Chalke [mailto:rchalke@broadbentinc.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 5:11 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: ARCO 4932: 16 E. Harding Way <br /> Hi Vicki, <br /> Thanks for reviewing it so quick. Below is my response to your questions: <br /> 1 had proposed a larger notification area as a conservative approach. However, I scaled it down <br /> to 300 feet radius plus some additional properties as highlighted in the attached drawing based <br /> on the historical detections in the boundary monitoring wells. I have provided the APNs for the <br /> properties that are highlighted. These addresses were all included in the previous list that I <br /> emailed. <br /> • I apologize for missing out on list of agencies. I have it attached now. <br /> • 1 read through several historical documents that were prepared for the site.The first report <br /> 2/19/2014 <br />