Laserfiche WebLink
Atlantic Richfield Company Page 14 <br /> ARCO Station No 4932 Stockton California August 29,2002 <br /> • Capture zones of approximately 31 feet and 48 feet were calculated in the <br /> downgradient and cross-gradient directions, respectively The capture zone was <br /> calculated using the Javandel and Tsang (1986) method <br /> • A pumping rate 4 and 6 gallons per minute was used for the constant rate drawdown <br /> pumping test <br /> • The geometric mean of T, K, and S for the observation wells was determined to be <br /> 0 34 ft2/min or 3,600 gdp/ft, 0 014 cm/sec, and 0 03, respectively <br /> The well installation and aquifer pumping test is documented in SECOR's report titled,Site <br /> Assessment and Aquifer Testing Results, dated June 7, 2002 <br /> 5.2.2 Conclusions <br /> Based on measurable drawdown of water levels in the pumping well and observation wells at <br /> pumping rates ranging between 4 and 6 gpm, and the calculated capture zone radii of 31 feet <br /> and 48 feet in the downgradient and cross-gradient directions,respectively, GWE appears to <br /> be a capable remedial alternative for removing petroleum hydrocarbons and MtBE from <br /> beneath the site The newly installed additional extraction well (EW-2) would also be used <br /> to capture and prevent the further downgradient migration of the dissolved petroleum <br /> . hydrocarbon/MtBE plume <br /> 5.3 Batch Extraction/Interim Remediation <br /> Batch extraction as a form of interim remediation was initiated on March 18, 2002 and was <br /> subsequently conducted on April 19, April 29, May 13, May 30, June 21, July 3, July 18, and <br /> August 2, 2002 Batch extraction events prior to May 30 were reported in SECOR's <br /> Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Second Quarter 2002 dated July 8, 2002 Batch <br /> extraction events after and including May 30, 2002, will be reported in the third quarter 2002 <br /> groundwater monitoring report As of August 2, 2002, 23,350 gallons of impacted <br /> groundwater have been removed from wells MW-1, MW-4, MW-6, SVE-1, EW-1, and EW- <br /> 2 by batch extraction The total volume of groundwater removed from batch extraction <br /> events is included in Table 8 <br /> 6.0 EVALUATION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES <br /> 6.1 Evaluation of Remedial Feasibility Testing and Remediation Goals <br /> The presence of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons and MtBE in on and off-site wells and the <br /> results of remediation feasibility testing are the basis for evaluating the effectiveness of <br /> proposed remedial alternatives <br /> • Two goals of this remediation effort are (1)the removal and/or in-situ biodegradation of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons and MtBE in soil and groundwater to below applicable cleanup <br /> I 1ARCO\49321PAR\PAR doc <br />