Laserfiche WebLink
y-azardcus waste v-olaticrs __ RG. Cc perate -cors 3a_ be h=--"- <br />2 _es cn__=- le `or _r CSvn ac --s __ -_.i^.g <br />3 I abcu- _c_do - waste (People v. Sangani (:494; -- C?: - 1120; <br />4 I based Cn the fact -hat the-` Corporate pcs--ion -aTie tie'; ccntrci <br />5 and aut^_crit_i tc __ave pre-.ented the-iiclat_cnS. Otis v. Superior <br />6 <br />Court (1905) 148 Ca- 129, 131; People v. Epstein 118 C. <br />7 <br />10; People v. Regan (1979) 95 CA3d Supp 1, 4. <br />8 <br />_. COURT RULES REGARDING SENTENCING FACTORS <br />a <br />10 ?lthcugh it ._as been agreed that proba-lcn ..ill ant11 ed, <br />-he People believe the Cour- snculd review -he 'ors <br />-11e 4_4(a), as we_- as 2 and 4 — i^_ Ce-erm--- _ the <br />12 -- - <br />V <br />13 appropriate ]ail tire to be i_21L'csed as a c-_ndit_= of <br />14 I The factors _-sten ___ 414 which apply -_ :_mac C --'.ants <br />15 <br />II are: <br />16 <br />1i The <br />nature, seriousness and circumstances <br />of the crime <br />17 <br />compared to <br />other instances of the same crime. Te <br />sheer cuanti-y; <br />18 <br />of the hazardous waste in this case distinguishes <br />it f_-,, the <br />-- <br />19 <br />maj or it_; of <br />hazardcus waste cases seen in this cc -_-nth✓. <br />20 <br />2) The <br />vulnerability of the victim. The land <br />:chn i <br />--cord, <br />21 <br />=inckel, had signed personal guaranties on his financing <br />of the <br />22 <br />property and has not been able to rent it since -efendaas <br />left <br />23 <br />in Decerner <br />1993. See his declaration. <br />24 <br />3) The <br />degree of monetary loss to the victim. <br />See above. <br />25 <br />26 <br />4) The <br />Defendants were active participants in <br />the crime. <br />27 <br />m <br />0 <br />