Laserfiche WebLink
Sec. VI Genorator Status <br /> A. 1989 gonoration (CHECK ONE BOX BELOW) E. Reason for•got gencseng ICHECK ALL THAT APPLY) <br /> Instructor.page 8 Page 10 <br /> ❑ 1 No (CONTINUE TO BOX e) ❑ t Never generated ❑ 4 Only noo-haxerdom waste <br /> 2 LOG ❑ 2 Out of busioess ❑ 5 Periodio or ocaasionel generator <br /> J SCG —� (SKIP TO SEC.V 1) C33 Only excluded or delisted waste ❑ 9 Waste min mlaaton activity <br /> [J4 CESOG J ❑ 7 Other(S�FCIFY IN COMMENTS) <br /> Sec. VIIOn-Site Waste Management Status <br /> A Storage El, RCRA treatment,recycling.of disposal C RCRA•exempt Ireatmem.recycling.or disposal <br /> Invructfor page 11 Page 11 Page 12 <br /> I <br /> Sec. VIIIWaste Minimization Activity during 1988 or 1989 !� <br /> A. Did the sl o begin or expand a zQk= 13. Did this site begin of expand a recycling C. Did this site conduct a source reduction or recycling <br /> :eduefi0rl activity during 1988 or 19897 activity during 1988 of 19897 ggporluNjy assessment ouring 1988 Of 19897 <br /> Instruction.page t> Page 13 Page 13 <br /> 1 Yal ill t Yes ❑ 1 Yes <br /> ❑ 2 No ❑ 2 No ❑ 2 No <br /> D. What factors have limited this site from Initiating new source reduction activities during 1988 of 19897 <br /> (CHECK P.LL THAT APPLY) <br /> Page 13 <br /> Q 01 No lectors have limited now source reduction activities. <br /> 02 Intutllcienl capital to install new source reduction equipment or Iroplerrent new source reduction practices. <br /> ❑ 03 Lack of technical Information on source reduction techniques applicable to the specr..c production processes. <br /> ❑ 04 Source reduction is not economically feasible: cost savings in waste management or production will not recover the capital Investment. <br /> ❑ 05 Concern that product quality mey decline as a result of source reduction. <br /> ❑ 06 Technical limitations of the production processes. 1 <br /> ❑ 07 Permitting burdens- <br /> ❑ <br /> 08 Oher(SPECIFY IN COMMENTS) <br /> t <br /> E. What factors have limited this site from initiating new on-site or off-site jig;.N .activities during 1998 or 19897 <br /> (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) <br /> Page 13 <br /> Q 01 No factors have limited new recycling activities. ❑ 07 Financial Iiabi!Ity provisions Inhibit shipments off site for recycling. <br /> ❑ 02 In%ufflcanl capital l0 install new recycling equipment ❑ 08 Technical limitations of product processes InMblt shipments oil silo <br /> or Implement new recycling practicesfor recyclhtg. <br /> EJ 03 Lack of lerhnical information on recycling techniques C1 ()9 Techi061 limitations of production processes Irhibil onsite rerycling. <br /> af-ploable 10 this sites specific production processes. ❑ 10 Permitting burdens inhibit recycling. <br /> ❑ 04 Rucyeling not economically feasible: cost savings in ❑ I 1 Lack of permited 011-slue recycling facilities, <br /> w.tste management or production will not recover the ❑ 12 Unable to identify a market for recyclable malorials. <br /> capital Inv-sstment. ❑ 13 Other (SPECIFY IN COMMENTS) <br /> ❑ 05 Concern trial product quality may decline as a result <br /> Of recycuna, <br /> ❑ 06 Raquiremunta to manifest wastes Inhibit shipments off <br /> site for recycling. <br /> Commantr-. <br /> Osnn of <br />