My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
3028
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0528381
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_PRE 2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2020 10:53:31 AM
Creation date
11/6/2018 8:41:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
PRE 2019
RECORD_ID
PR0528381
PE
2220
FACILITY_ID
FA0019299
FACILITY_NAME
PACIFIC ETHANOL STOCKTON LLC
STREET_NUMBER
3028
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
14502008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3028 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\222IAError\IAError\N\NAVY\3028\PR0528381\COMPLIANCE 2008 - 2015.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hey guys, <br /> Okay as for the acetone in the ERPE_01 (Trench). I see that it is noted. I do not know what would be the <br /> source of that as we do not have acetone on site. Not sure if the CORRPRO had potentially an acetone <br /> 'blanket' in the container with it to help with loss of product through volatilization. I know they do that <br /> with paint, but I am not aware if the CORRPRO has that. I will contact our vendor for it and get some <br /> more information if you want. <br /> Then the base sample was taken as I did not know the soil composition for the site itself and wanted a <br /> comparison to the soil that was left in the trench.The trench sample was taken at the lowest point on <br /> that back bend where the CORRPRO sat in concentration the longest,then the base was taken further <br /> towards the entrance of the product into the trench,but it was up the side of the trench closer to the <br /> fence line. <br /> As we discussed when you guys were out on site,we were going to take a sample out in the field on the <br /> other side of the fence, but for ease of sampling (since the bins also needed to be completed), I felt that <br /> a sample where you guys observed it,was fine.And as for the results,there is no issue. <br /> Okay I will work on the acetone information for you guys, and do not hesitate to let me know if you have <br /> any other questions. <br /> From:Garrett Backus [EH] [mailto:gbackus@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 1:20 PM <br /> To:Jordan Cain ClCain@pacificethanol.com> <br /> Cc:Haza Saeed [EH] <hsaeed s'cehd.com> <br /> Subject:RE: CORRPRO Spill-Sample Results <br /> HiJordan, <br /> Also, can you describe where the "base"sample was taken and why it was taken? <br /> Thank you, <br /> Garrett <br /> From: Haza Saeed [EH] <br /> Sera: Monday, February 27, 2017 1:14 PM <br /> To: Jordan Cain; Garrett Backus [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: CORRPRO Spill -Sample Results <br /> Hi Jordan, <br /> Can you please send me a copy of the disposal records? Acetone was detected in the Trench Soil sample <br /> (ERPE_01);do you have more information on this? <br /> Thank you <br /> Haza <br /> From:Jordan Cain [ailto:JCain@pacificethanol.com] <br /> Sent:Saturday, February 4, 2017 10:37 AM <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.