COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

D. Results of Testing/Servicio Software Version Installed: Coy+plete the followine checklist: 0 s ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? s ❑ No* Is the visual alarm o emtional? ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested. and confirmed operational? es Cl No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their proper o ration? ❑ Yes ❑ If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) N/A operational? For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operafpt or is electrically disconn ? If yes: which sensors initiate shut -down? (Check . positive all that apply) sumparench Sensors; tspenser�Con � nt Sensors. Did ou confirm sitive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? M*Tes; C2 No. For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank jYesN'* fill oint(s) and o tin roer1 ? If so, at what rcent of tank ca aci does the alarm triger? Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all re lacement arts in Section E, below. Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑Product; ❑ Water. If es, describe causes in Section E, below. Was monimrin s stem set -u reviewed to ensure r r settin s? Attach set u re rts, if a licable Is all monitmin i ment o ational r manufacturer's ' mcations? in Section E; oeiow, descrine now and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. E. Comments: Page 2 of 3 03/01