My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2013-2016
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
420
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231458
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2013-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2023 4:47:19 PM
Creation date
11/7/2018 12:20:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2013-2016
RECORD_ID
PR0231458
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001196
FACILITY_NAME
SAVE ON FUEL
STREET_NUMBER
420
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
219-312-06
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
420 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\Y\YOSEMITE\420\PR0231458\COMPLIANCE INFO 2013-2016.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2013-2016
QuestysRecordDate
5/22/2018 4:08:03 PM
QuestysRecordID
3898484
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D.Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 34(v y 33 -1 OO-c- <br /> Com lete the following checklist: <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes I ❑ No* I Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment <br /> will not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g., modem) <br /> ® N/A operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: -which sensors <br /> initiate positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ® Sump french Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment <br /> Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ®Yes; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e., no <br /> ® N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? % <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment <br /> replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> • In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: This is anew monitoring system for this site, installation was by another contractor. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.