My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
UAR/PROP 65
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MARIPOSA
>
2467
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231818
>
UAR/PROP 65
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2020 4:43:57 PM
Creation date
11/7/2018 6:29:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
UAR/PROP 65
RECORD_ID
PR0231818
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0022456
FACILITY_NAME
Foodliner, Inc.
STREET_NUMBER
2467
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MARIPOSA
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
Stockton
Zip
95205
APN
17130003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2467 E Mariposa Rd
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MARIPOSA\2467\PR0231818\UAR_ PROP 65.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> Instructions for Completing UST Unauthorized Release (Leak)/Contamination Site Report <br /> EMERGENCY:Indicate whether emergency response personnel and equipment were involved at any time. If so,a Hazardous Material Incident Report <br /> should be fled with the State Office of Emergency Services ICES). Indicate whether the OES report has been filed as of the date of this report. <br /> LOCAL AGENCY USE ONLY: To avoid duplicate notifications pursuant to Health and safety Code Section 25180.7, a designated government <br /> employee should sign and date the form in this block. A signature here does not mean that the leak has been determined to pose a significant threat to <br /> human health or safety,only that notification procedures have been followed if required. <br /> REPORTED BY:Enter name,telephone number,and address. Indicate which party you represent and provide company or agency name. <br /> SIGNATURE:Sign the form in the space provided. <br /> RESPONSIBLE PARTY:Enter the name,telephone number,contact person,and address of the party responsible for the leak. The Responsible Party <br /> would normally be the tank owner. <br /> SITE LOCATION: Enter information regarding the tank facility. At a minimum,you must provide the facility name and full site address. <br /> IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES:Enter the names of the local agency and Regional Water Quality Control Board having jurisdiction over the site. <br /> SUBSTANCES INVOLVED: Enter the name and quantity lost of the hazardous substance(s)involved. If more than two substances leaked,list the two <br /> of most concern for cleanup. <br /> DISCOVERY/ABATEMENT:Provide information regarding the discovery and abatement of the leak. <br /> SOURCE: Indicate the source(s)of the leak. Check sourc(es)that apply. <br /> CAUSE:Check box(es)that apply. Only use"other"when the release source is known,but does not ft into any of the other categories. For example <br /> releases from vent and vapor recovery lines. <br /> CASE TYPE: Check one box only. Indicate the Case Type category for this leak. Case Type is based on the most sensitive resource affected. For <br /> example,if both soil and ground water have been affected,Case Type will be"Groundwater." Indicate"Drinking Water"only if one or more municipal or <br /> domestic water wells have actually been affected. A"Groundwater"designation does not imply that the affected water cannot be, or is not, used for <br /> drinking water,but only that water wells have not yet been affected. It is understood that Case Type may change upon further investigation. <br /> CURRENT STATUS: Check one box only. Indicate the category which best describes the Current Status of the case. The response should be relative <br /> to the Case Type. For example, if the Case Type is"Groundwater,"then Current Status should refer to the status of the ground water investigation or <br /> cleanup,as opposed to that of soil. Descriptions of options are as follows: <br /> • Open-Site Assessment—An investigation to determine whether groundwater and/or soil have/has been, or will be, impacted as a result of the <br /> release. <br /> ➢ Open- Assessment & Interim Remedial Action —An investigation to determine whether groundwater and/or soil have/has been, or will be, <br /> impacted as a result of the release and appropriate actions to prevent or address an immediate threat to human health or the environment. <br /> ➢Open-Remediation—Remedial activities to prevent or address a threat to human health orthe environment as a result of the release. <br /> • Open-Verification Monitoring— Periodic groundwater or other monitoring at the site to verify and/or evaluate the effectiveness of remedial <br /> activities. <br /> ➢ Open-Inactive—No activities have been implemented to determine whether groundwater and/or soil were/was impacted by the release. <br /> ➢Closed-No Further Action Required—Regional Water Quality Control Board and local agency Local Oversight Program agree that no further <br /> work is necessary at the site. <br /> IMPORTANT:THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM IS INTENDED FOR GENERAL STATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO <br /> BE CONSTRUED AS REPRESENTING THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF ANY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY. <br /> REMEDIAL ACTON:Indicate which actions have been used to clean up or remediate the leak.Descriptions of options are as follows: <br /> D Human health exposure control? Yes—Assessments for human exposures indicate there are no unacceptable human exposure pathways and <br /> the Regional Water Quality Control Board or other regulatory agency staff has determined the site is under control for current conditions. <br /> D Human health exposure control? No—Data indicate that there are complete human exposures pathways that present unacceptable exposures <br /> to humans,and actions have yet to be completed to address these human exposure pathways for the entire site. <br /> ➢ Human health exposure control? Unknown — There is not sufficient information to determine whether there are any current, complete <br /> unacceptable human exposure pathways at the site. <br /> ➢Groundwater migration control? Yes—All information on known and reasonably expected groundwater contamination has been reviewed and <br /> that the migration of contaminated groundwater is stabilized and there is no unacceptable discharge to surface water and monitoring will be <br /> conducted to confirm that affected groundwater remains in the original area of contamination. <br /> ➢Groundwater migration control? No—All information on known and reasonably expected groundwater contamination has been reviewed and <br /> that the migration of contaminated groundwater is not stabilized. <br /> •Groundwater migration control? Unknown—There is not sufficient information to determine whether the migration of contaminated groundwater <br /> is stabilized. <br /> ➢ No Action Required(NAR)—Incident is minor,requiring no remedial action. <br /> ➢ Excavate and Dispose(ED)—Remove contaminated soil and dispose at approved facility. <br /> ➢ Excavate and Treat(ET)—Remove contaminated soil and treat(includes spreading or land farming). <br /> ➢ Free Product Removal(FPR)—Remove floating product from water table. <br /> • Treatment at Hookup(TH)—Install water treatment devices at each dwelling or other place of use. <br /> • Replace Supply(RS)—Provide alternate water supply to affected parties. <br /> • Other—Other remedial actions that are not listed above. <br /> COMMENTS:Use this space to elaborate on any aspects of the incident. <br /> SWRCB Leak Report Form htip://www.swrcb.cs.govhvater_issues/programs/ust/forms/ Rev.02/01/2012 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.