My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MINER
>
601
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231183
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2020 4:38:52 PM
Creation date
11/7/2018 8:40:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0231183
PE
2381
FACILITY_ID
FA0003971
FACILITY_NAME
K&K CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
601
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MINER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
601 E MINER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\IAError\M\MINER\601\PR0231183\COMPLIANCE 1986 - 2011.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pete Giambanco, Sr. MAY 2 Q 1995 <br /> Claim No . 830 <br /> Final Division Decision <br /> Page 6 <br /> parties fight over who the contamination "belongs" to. This is <br /> not considered a valid excuse to postpone or prolong cleanup. <br /> Section 25299 . 7 of the Health and Safety Code authorizes local <br /> agencies to issue directives for the purpose of cleanup, <br /> including naming a responsible party who must comply with those <br /> directives . If the responsible party does not comply with <br /> directives, they are in violation of state law. Before his <br /> death, Giambanco had many opportunities to correct the <br /> deficiencies but instead chose to ignore the directives and <br /> violate state law. We believe that legislative intent was to <br /> provide support to those individuals who complied with state <br /> laws, to the extent they were able, in meeting the permit and <br /> corrective action requirements . <br /> In cases of passive acquisition, we have allowed the recipient to <br /> acquire the eligibility of the deceased. In this case, however, <br /> it is the ineligibility. You assert that the "estate" of <br /> Giambanco has proceeded with the cleanup since his death. For <br /> purposes of eligibility, we consider the person and his estate to <br /> be one and the same . To do otherwise would cause the estate to <br /> be considered a separate claimant and the estate would have to <br /> file a separate claim. Even if we did not have this policy, the <br /> estate would be ineligible because the former owner (Giambanco) <br /> is ineligible, and likewise Giambanco is ineligible because of <br /> Shaughnessy. <br /> Because both Shaughnessy and Giambanco were out of compliance <br /> with permit requirements and Giambanco was out of compliance with <br /> corrective action directives, I must uphold the final staff <br /> decision to reject the claim. <br /> It should be pointed out that if Giambanco is successful in his <br /> efforts to rescind the purchase agreement, he will not have owned <br /> the tanks, and therefore would not be an eligible claimant . <br /> If you are not in agreement with this final Division decision, <br /> you may file a petition for review by the State Water Resources <br /> Control Board within thirty (30) calendar days from the date of <br /> receipt of this letter as provided for in Article 5 of the <br /> Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund Regulations, <br /> Title 23 , Division 3 , Chapter 18 of the California Code of <br /> Regulations dated December 2 , 3991 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.