My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2016 - 2018
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
10878
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231598
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2016 - 2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:51:14 PM
Creation date
11/8/2018 9:48:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2016 - 2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231598
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001146
FACILITY_NAME
MORADA CHEVRON FAST N EASY #60*
STREET_NUMBER
10878
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
APN
08607002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
10878 N HWY 99 E
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\N\HWY 99\10878\PR0231598\COMPLIANCE INFO 2016 - PRESENT .PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2016 - PRESENT
QuestysRecordDate
5/17/2017 4:28:22 PM
QuestysRecordID
3383804
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> X Yes ❑ No' Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> X Yes ❑ No' Is the visual alar operational? <br /> X Yes ❑ No' Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> X Yes ❑ No' Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their <br /> ro er o eration? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No' If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g.modem)operational? <br /> X N/A <br /> X Yes ❑ No' For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system <br /> ❑ N/A detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors initiate positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) <br /> X Sump/Trench Sensors; Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor <br /> failure/disconnection? XYes; ❑ No. <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No' For lank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention <br /> X N/A valve is installed),is the overfill warning alar visible and audible at the tank fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent <br /> of tank capacity does the alar trigger? % <br /> X Yes` No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the <br /> manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes' X No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ Product; ❑Water. If <br /> es,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> X Yes ❑ No` Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> X Yes ❑ No" Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> •In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 12107 <br /> 2 2/21/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.