Laserfiche WebLink
is <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br /> Aris Cacapit [EH] <br /> From: sandeep Singh [lodi76@yahoo.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 8:03 AM <br /> To: Aris Cacapit[EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 1111 E Kettleman Ln. EVR upgrade application SR0056270 <br /> hi aris, <br /> how are you? hope great... <br /> well i have talk to robert to email you how the carbon canister going to be <br /> installed. <br /> as there going to be only one carbon canister installed. <br /> and the vapor for 87 & 91 are going to go through it. <br /> if you don;t receive email from robert let me know . <br /> and if you need anymore information let me know please. <br /> thank you <br /> regards <br /> sandeep <br /> 408-806-9148 <br /> --- On Fri, 1/16/09,Aris Cacapit [EH] <acacapit@sjcehd.com>wrote: <br /> From: Aris Cacapit [EH] <acacapit@sjcehd.com> <br /> Subject: RE: 1111 E Kettleman Ln. EVR upgrade application SR0056270 <br /> To: lodi76@yahoo.com, Reliablepetro@sbcglobal.net <br /> Cc: "Willy Ng [EH]" <wng@sjcehd.com> <br /> Date: Friday, January 16, 2009, 3:28 PM <br /> Good Afternoon Robert& Sandeep <br /> In order to continue processing the permit application, describe how the vapors from the vent lines of the <br /> 87 tank and 91 tank will be recovered by a single canister attached to a single vent riser of either the 87 <br /> or the 91? <br /> To which vent riser will the VR carbon canister be attached? <br /> If only attached to one vent riser, then how will the vapors of the other octane be recovered? <br /> Or will two canisters be attached, one to each octane vent riser? <br /> Or will the vent risers of the 87&91 be manifolded before being connected to the VR carbon cannister? <br /> Aris Cacapit, EHS <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> 600 E.Main St. <br /> Stockton,CA 95202 <br /> (209)468-3453 desk <br /> (209)468-3433 fax <br /> 1/21/2009 <br />