My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO 2008 - 2015
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
1111
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0506724
>
COMPLIANCE INFO 2008 - 2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2023 10:12:19 AM
Creation date
11/8/2018 10:22:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2008 - 2015
RECORD_ID
PR0506724
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0007594
FACILITY_NAME
WINE COUNTRY STATION/7-ELEVEN
STREET_NUMBER
1111
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04931056
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1111 E KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS3\K\KETTLEMAN\1111\PR0506724\COMPLIANCE INFO 2008 - 2015.PDF
QuestysFileName
COMPLIANCE INFO 2008 - 2015
QuestysRecordDate
6/27/2018 4:14:35 PM
QuestysRecordID
3926585
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
368
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: <br /> Co tete <br /> the folio e-in checklist: <br /> es ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> Eryeg_ ❑_No*_ _1_s the visual alarm operational? :oa <br /> _ <br /> es ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionallytested,and confirmed operational? <br /> Q'Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and poned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ❑ Yes KN/A <br /> o* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all commutions equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> operational? <br /> D'Yes o* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down e piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operateor is electrically disconn ? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut down? (Check all that apply) Uk�ump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dnser Con ent Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm ositive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnn? es; ❑No. <br /> ❑ Yes Q Dldr For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as. the primary taverfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> U'IN/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning avisible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating If so,at what percent of tank capacity the alarm tri er? % <br /> Yes* o Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, es, or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all relacement arts in Sectiobelow.❑ Yes* No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as drtems? (Check all that apply) ❑Product; ❑ Water. If es,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Ery�es ❑ No* Was monitorin s stem set-u reviewed to ensure ro er settin s?Attach sere orfs, if a licable <br /> ❑'Yes Q No* Is all monitoring a ui mentoperational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br /> Page 2 of 3 03101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.