Laserfiche WebLink
• _ • 29 February 2000 . <br /> Mr. W.T. Nickerson - 2 - <br /> in the well furthest away(MW-12). There does not appear to be a corresponding fluctuation in <br /> constituent concentrations in these upgradient wells. <br /> The largest fluctuations of consitutuent concentrations in groundwater occur in MW-8, which is <br /> approximately 130 feet west of the northern former disposal pond. During low flows in the canal, <br /> MW-8 is downgradient from the northern disposal pond, and during high flows, it is sidegradient. <br /> During high flows, constituent concentrations in MW-8 are comparable to concentrations in the <br /> upgradient well. <br /> Concentrations of most constituents in the two downgradient wells closest to the northern former <br /> disposal pond(MW-8 and MW-6) are highest during periods of low groundwater elevations. In contrast, <br /> the monitoring well directly adjacent to the northern former pond(MW-2) contains its highest <br /> concentrations during periods of high groundwater elevations. <br /> The peak concentrations of nitrate, dibromochloromethane, chloroform, and ethylene dibromide in <br /> downgradient wells MW-8 and MW-6 are greater than the peak concentrations in MW-2 at the disposal <br /> pond. This suggests that the center of mass of these constituents originating beneath the northern <br /> disposal pond is migrating downgradient. <br /> In contrast, concentrations of 1,2,3-trichloropropane, 1,2-dichloropropane, and dibromochloropropane <br /> are greatest in MW-2, suggesting that these constituents travel more slowly than the others. <br /> Report Details <br /> The <br /> The constituent concentration graphs and hydrographs present information dating back to 1993. a rate of <br /> data in the graphs suggest that concentrations declined after the ponds were capped, and suggest <br /> constituent movement. Trends in the data will be more easily identified if you will incorporate a few <br /> manipulations to the data and graphs. <br /> Since there appears to be a relationship between groundwater elevations and constituent concentrations, <br /> it will help to see this if the hydrograph can be visually correlated with the constituent concentration <br /> time graphs. <br /> Three examples of how to accomplish this are: <br /> 1. All the graphs can be produced at the same horizontal scale, so that the reader can overlay the <br /> hydrograph onto the concentration graphs. <br /> 2. The hydrograph data can be incorporated into each concentration graph by using independent vertical <br /> axes. <br /> 3. The hyrdrograph can be reproduced as a separate graph on the same page at the same horizontal scale <br /> as the concentration graphs. <br /> These graphs should also indicate dates of significant physical events, specifically, when the ponds <br /> were capped. <br />