Laserfiche WebLink
David Stavarek, R.G. <br /> June 29, 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> P=Ose of thp,Workplan <br /> The purpose of the Workplan is to describe the methodology proposed by Sierra-Pacific for <br /> conducting a health risk assessment(HRA) for the Former PuroGroBrea Facility site. <br /> According to the Workplan, the purpose of the HRA is"to evaluate potential risks to human <br /> health associated with chemical substances that have been detected in on-site soil and in ground <br /> water both on- and off-site" (see comment 2 for Section 5,below). A HRA has been requested <br /> by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) as partial requirement for <br /> evaluating the need for soil and/or groundwater remediation or cleanup of this site. <br /> General Comments <br /> The Workplan is a well-organized document. A number of statements need to be clarified, <br /> though. The comments below are issues and statements based on current practices in health risk <br /> assessment as used by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment(OEHHA). We <br /> would like to see these comments addressed in the final HRA prepared by Sierra-Pacific rather <br /> than in a new draft of the Workplan. In the text,the acronym"Cal-EPA" is used;the correct <br /> acronym is Cal/EPA. <br /> SECTION 4.0 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL(CS4 <br /> 1. Current use and zoning of land. According to page 13, the authors state that". . . for the <br /> purposes of the CSM and HRA, current on-site land use is characterized as a standard <br /> `industrial/commercial' facility,which will continue as such for 30 years into the future <br /> (deterministic HRA)." The Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (PEA) Guidance Manual <br /> (page 2-17), however,requires the use of a residential use of the land, regardless of the <br /> current use and zoning of the site. OEHHA supports this guidance unless there is a deed <br /> restriction placed on the use of this land. The probabilistic approach,however,may use other <br /> exposure scenarios in addition to the residential. <br /> 2. Surface soil and contaminant levels. According to Section 4.2,"surface soils are considered <br /> to include only the top three feet of soil" (page 14). PEA Guidance requires that"The <br /> sampling strategy should ensure that locations which would likely contain the highest <br /> contaminant concentrations will be sampled"and"The maximum depth of sampling will <br /> depend on the potential for migration of the contaminants through soil." (page 2-9). For this <br /> purpose, PEA Guidance incorporates the "swimming pool construction" scenario in the <br /> residential use of land. As a result,PEA Guidance implicitly assumes a depth of up to <br /> 10 feet as "surface soil" containing the maximum observed concentration of contaminant. It <br /> is recommended that the 0-3 ft depth proposed in the Workplan be extended to 10 ft in the <br />