Laserfiche WebLink
I This,StipulafJonfor Entry offlnl judgmcnVDn Consent("Consent.Judgmejiv")Js entered <br /> into by Plaintiff,the People of the State of catifornta,("People").and.Delip.ndant WaW, rt Stores, <br /> 3. Inc.("WatmMarf). For purposes of this Consent Judgment the People and Wal-Mart.shall be <br /> :4 re,forredto collee6vely as"Partles.',anti individually a4.4`Party,` <br /> 5 1NTR0.DjL�_-T10N <br /> 6 This..atter relates to diePeople's inves(iga.tion into Wal-MaWs tomP fiance with state laws <br /> 7 and regulations governing the storage, handling,treatment,transportation,and disposal of <br /> ha Wou.;waste ori: hazMow materials pursuant tis aiid'gifay Code,C Chapters 4.5, 6.. <br /> _4 7 <br /> 9'.. Jend- 1.915.114t wv(kDartxs operating retail.factlities in'Calffornia on and before J16-ruary 22,201.0. <br /> 10 As Se foxt b,i I n theQ 9j.-ii p , -t, the Peopleallele <br /> I I that Wal-Mart violated Chapters 6.5,6.7,and 6.95.0 Division 20 of the.I and Safety Code <br /> 12 and the:-roplatiops promu.Igated Linder thesephapters, and Business and P_ro&ssioris, Code s.-ootion <br /> 13 17200,et seq., by its improper storage, handling,transportation,and-disposal afha7ardous waste <br /> 14 aadliazar0ous materials at and from Wal-Mart's California facilities from January 15,2001, <br /> 15 through and includ.Ing February 2.2,2010. <br /> The Parties engaged-in settlement.negotiations prior to the filing of'this.,Consent Jodgment. <br /> 17 In these negotiations,the People were represented by the Attorney General of'the State,of <br /> 18 California and the District Attorneys for the counties of Los Angeles,Monterey, Orange., <br /> 19 Riverside mB <br /> Sacra <br /> iento, San ernardincr,San Diego, San Joaquin, and Solano, and the additional <br /> 20 District Attorneys who are signatories to this Consent Judgment, Wal-Mart was represented by <br /> Z I Gibson, Dunn,& Crutcher I_LP_ <br /> 212 'rh,.c People believe that the resolution embodied in this Consent Judament is fair and <br /> Z <br /> 23. reasonable and fulfills the People's eaforcementobjectivos;that the terms of the Consent <br /> 24 Judgment are appropriate; that no'further action is warranted concerning the specific violations <br /> 25 alleged in the Complaint, except as provided in this Consent Judgment;and that entry of this <br /> 26 Consent Judgment is in the best interest of the public. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 <br /> 4 <br /> MPULATION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDOMENT ON CONSENT <br />