COMPLIANCE INFO - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

to each including the caveat that the most-recent version of APSA has NOT been adopted to-date although it has been used as a key reference in this Plan. Line item#706 narrative/response: All parties recognize this long-standing oversight and corrective action to remove and replace the non-compliant 1000-gallon gasoline AST is underway. The owner/operator will follow-up with specific details on completion dates for this matter. Line item#710 narrative/response: The PE wet-stamp/certification will include specific references to alternative methods for conducting equivalent protocols for: a) Inspections which are conducted by the owner/operator on a frequency as stipulated by the AHJ. SPC Corp recommends weekly inspections; federal/state/local guidelines normally require monthly inspections by a qualified employee of the FRO owner/operator. b) Periodic Integrity Tests conducted by SPC Corp were done in accordance with 40CFR112 (US EPA) as well as Chapter 7-Regional Inspectors Guide under the"hybrid' section of the reference. SPC Corp has encountered numerous events in onsite testing where STI SP001 created"destructive"testing by imposing air-pressure and/or vacuum/negative pressure on both primary and secondary containment in both damage to weld seams due to metal fatigue as well as failure to adequately make the test-subject "leak-tight"during the test-----this issue created "false-negative"results which have been demonstrated to AHIs that the alternative test methods referenced in the Final DRAFT of the SPCC plan are equivalent and, in fact, more accurate than STI SP001. We/SPC Corp do NOT market this conclusion and would prefer to keep any marketplace dissent between STI and SPC Corp a separate matter. The PE has wet-stamped/cerfifred the periodic integrity testing procedures are equivalent and meet federal/state/local requirements. Line item#726 narrative/response: The Final DRAFT slice plan now addresses this deficiency and installation of the said O/F devices (UL-listed boxes) on each respective container are m- process. The owner/operator will stipulate a completion date beyond the Final DRAFT spec plan certification. Line item#4010 narrative/response: The Final DRAFT spec plan includes the Substantial Harm Criteria. Owner/operator will complete Appendix C and maintain said Appendix onsite. Upon confirmation that the AW has reviewed the Final DRAFT slice plan (which is submitted with this addendum) and frtal-pagination of each cross-referenced issue has been adequately included,the PE will wet-stamp/certify the SPCC plan. The owner/operator will then complete the Return to Compliance Certification form and submit to EHD as well as maintain a copy onsite.