SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE

Home Browse Search

i Quality!Con r�ol Board California Regional WaterQ y' °� g Central Valley Region J` Robert Schneider,Chair ; Gray Davis inston H.Hickox 3 Governor fSecretary for Sacramento Main office i Environmental IntemetAddress: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcb Protection 3443 Routier Road,Suite A,Sacramento,California 95827-3003 f Phone(916)255-3000•FAX(916)255-3015 I+ tAaR o 4 2002 , 3 April 2002 !' _,IENVIRION:Mi�4 i; AETH PERM IT/SERViL1-S i Mr. Jess Cervantes JC Trucking S y PO Box 6008 1207 Aurora Street n p h Stockton, CA 95206 Stockton,CA 95206 CERTIFIED MAIL CERTIFIED MAIL 3 700Q052000242571=37-54� '`70001-6'7000006997-4969=%- r r. REQUEST FOR TIME SCHEDULE, t G JC TR UCKING, 1207 A URORA STREET,STOCKTON, SAN JOA QUIN COUNTY Review of our file shows that four underground storage tanks (USTs)wer1removed from the subject site iir ,May 1992, and petroleum hydrocarbons were identified in tank pit soil samples. Subsequent investigations and reporting show maximum contaminant concentrations in groundwater at 96,000 micrograms per liter(µg11)total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), 7,500 µg11 benzene, and 450 pµgll 1,2-dichloroethane. The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(County) documented that limited soil and groundwater ber 1996 and August 1999;"however, more recent site investigations were completed between Decem investigation and reporting has not been completed in a timely manner. E Il On 30 August 2000,the County approved the 31 July 2000 Addendum to Workplan fo/Additional Investigation (Workplan Addendum) submitted by JJW Geosciences,Incorporated(JJW) for the subject site. Mr. Jess !�i Cervantes,the responsible party,was directed by the County to implement the approved Workplan Addendum in January 2001 and again in March 2001 (copy of County letter attached). The Workplan Addendum was.not implemented until May 2001, and an Assessment Report was not submitted until 14 November 2001,thus,fifteen months after the Workplan Addendum was approved. After reviewing the Site Assessment Report,the County = �� directed you to submit a plan of work to conduct a feasibilitystudy by-2.lJanuary__2002:_Based on your failure tom, submit the required plan of work, and general disregard for County directives,the County has referred the site to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for regulatory enforcement. In addition to delinquent workplans and investigation reports,you have failed to complete and submit quarterly monitoring and progress reports as required Y uired b Title 23 Chapter 16,Article 5, Section 2652 {c and d)of the California Code of Regulations(UST Regulations). We have not received the second,.third, or fourth quarter monitoring and progress reports for 2001, and as indicated by JJW on 2 April 2002, groundwater monitoring and sampling for the first quarter of 2002 has not been completed. Quarterly itonitoring reports are due by the end of the month following the quarter in which samples were taken(31 January,30 April,31 July,aad 31 October}. I spoke with your other consultant,Mr. Pieter Crosby of PC Toxic on 27:;March 2002;°and he stated that the I requested feasibility study workplan has not been completed to date. Helfadded.that an UST Cleanup Fund California Environmental Protection Agency Recycled Paper i 13 The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs,see our Web-site a[�http:l/www.swreb.ca-gov/rwgcbS v '4