Laserfiche WebLink
thus, the gasoline mass in the three concentric rings are: <br /> (0.16)(680,000 L)(40,000 µg&)(1 kg 11,000,000,000.µg) 4.35 kilograms (kg) <br /> (0.34)(680,000 L)'(5004tgIL)(1 kg 1 1,000,000,000 µg) = 1.16 kg <br /> „! (0.50)(680,000 L)(500 tigIL)(1 kg 11,000,000,000 µg) = 0.17 kg <br /> 4.35 kg + 1.16 kg + 0.17 kg = 5.7 kg total mass of TPH-gasoline in the groundwater. <br /> All final mathematical results reported with two significant figures. <br /> 3.1.1.2 TPH-diesel <br /> Areal extent of groundwater plume from figure 7: 1000 square feet (ft2) 1 TPH-diesel <br /> Estimated thickness of highly contaminated groundwater: 10 feet (ft) <br /> L Presumed porosity (interstitial space): 30% <br /> 1 cubic foot (ftp) = 28.5 liters (L) . <br /> Average contaminant concentrations of diesel = 400 µg/l_ U/w00 W6 <br /> thus, (1000 ft2)(10 ft)(0.30)(28.5 L I ft3) = 85,000 L of highly impacted groundwater a ` <br /> thus, {85,000 L}(400 µg/L)(1 kg 1 1,000,000,000 µg) = 0.034 kilograms {kg} } t <br /> All final mathematical results reported with two significant figures. <br /> 3.2 Mass Balance of Contaminants in Soil <br /> The mass quantity of TPH gasoline and diesel in the impacted soil above the groundwater <br /> k table is calculated using analytical data from the soil samples collected when installing <br /> monitor wells MW-2 and MW-5 which are located in the' former UST tank excavation <br /> areas. Previously, soil samples had also been collected from nine borings, B-1 through <br /> B-9. Analytical results from the samples collected above thei groundwater table and <br /> outside the tank excavation area were non-detect for analyzed compounds. The borings <br /> inside the tank excavation area appear to be collocated with the groundwater monitor wells <br /> and were used to confirm the presence of hydrocarb6n contamination. Since the <br /> excavation borings and the monitor wells were collocated use df,either data set would be <br /> appropriate. The monitor well data was selected because it was represented more resent <br /> data and contained higher values. JJW nor the property owners know of any other <br />! available data. <br /> The volume of impacted soil is calculated using a thickness of 20 feet estimated UST <br /> p g , ( <br /> excavation bottom to the groundwater table) and an estimated areal extent of 100 square <br /> feet per excavation producing a volume of 2000 cubic feet per excavation. <br /> Analytical data from the monitor well soil samples collected under the gasoline UST <br /> excavation infer a vertical average of 6700 mg/Kg of TPHJ gasoline. The contamination <br /> value is assumed to be zero as you move laterally away;from the impacted soil zone. <br /> Assuming a soil density of 45 kg per cubic foot, the impacted soil is estimated to have a <br /> mass of 90,000 kg. JJW calculates the estimated mass of gasoline in place in the soil <br /> above the groundwater table to be 600 kg. Based on themonitor'well sail data JJW infers <br />'4 that there is probable gasoline contamination adsorbed to the soil below the current <br /> groundwater table. However, there is currently not enough data to calculate the mass. <br /> 3 JJW GEOSCIENCES Inc. <br />