Laserfiche WebLink
� y,z „, Pr,• ,„ �� F <br /> Rd <br /> zNOUN,. <br /> !_-- w <br /> y - <br /> On December 18, 1989, Jim Thorpe Oil , Inc. removed two (2) 1,000 <br /> underground fuel tanks which had contained leaded & unleaded <br /> gasoline and diesel; see Exhibit "A. " Five soil samples were <br /> taken as shown on Exhibit "B; " one at each end of both tanks, and <br /> one beneath the pump island. Results of lab analysis showed that <br /> the samples from the north end of the tanks, (GS#1 & SS#2,) were <br /> below detection limits, but contamination was reported for the <br /> other 3; (refer to Table I.) <br /> A Re-excavation/Resample Work Plan was submitted by Jim Thorpe <br /> Oil, Inc. on April 4, 1990, to remove additional spoil and <br /> r-sample as shown on Exhibits "C" & "D." <br /> Work commenced on August 1, 1990, using Jim Thorpe Oil equipment <br /> under the direction and supervision of W.J. Hunter, Registered <br /> 4 Geologist, and Harlon Knoll , EHS. The sedimonts consisted <br /> primarily of very fine to fine, friable, sandy loam, tan to buff, <br /> f with occassional lenses of grayish-tan clay. No distinct bedding <br /> was noted; soil was loose and poorly indurated. The sands were <br /> primarily quartz and feldspar, with a clayey matrix. Portions of <br /> the excavation were damp, but quickly dried upon exposure to the <br /> air. <br /> A definite petroleum odor was noted from the upper portion of the <br /> excavation, but became fainter with depth. Some discoloration <br /> was evident, especially in the area beneath the site of the pump <br /> island. No free product, odor or color was noted in any of the <br /> samples placed in :nater, although some showed a slight film an <br /> fthe water surface. <br /> The hole was extended to about 25' X 25', and deepened to <br /> yapproximately 20' at the south end and about 23-24' at the north <br /> end. Although there was still some apparent contamination <br /> remaining, the limitations of the equipment prevented further <br /> excavation. Six (6) samples were taken from the sides and bottom <br /> of thw excavation as indicated on Exhibits "E" & "F. " They were <br /> properly sealed, labeled, and placed on ice by W. J. . Hunter, <br /> stored overnight in as freezer, and transported to Cananie lab the <br /> fallowing day under proper chain of custody. <br /> Analysis of the laboratory results showed that the sidewall <br /> 1 samples taken an the south, west, and north. walls, and the west <br /> bottom sample, (8--1,) were clean. However, the east bottom <br /> sample, (8-2,) and the sidewall sample from, the east wall (SW-4,) <br /> still contained detectable- -levels of contaminants. _ Refer- --to <br /> > Exhibit "E" and Table II .for test results. <br /> " D WORK ENLARGE EXISTING EXCAVATION TO THE SOUTH AND <br /> PROPOSE <br /> �-' EAST, RESAMPLE AND RETEST FOR CONTAMINATION: <br /> 2 <br />