Laserfiche WebLink
Lodi Ready Mix Page 8 <br /> Site Closure Report <br /> Project No. 93.1 <br /> May 12, 1995 <br /> ITS <br /> will tend to preferentially travel along the finer grain units before <br /> transitioning to a coarser grained unit (at saturation). <br /> Therefore because no diesel Y <br /> range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in <br /> P <br /> the silt at 25-27 ft we conclude that this is layer represents the vertical limit of <br />' the contamination. The horizontal limits have been interpolated to be <br /> approximately five feet inward from the walls of the excavation. These limits <br /> are supported by laboratory analytical data which show that all of the <br /> confirmation samples tested from SB-1 are free of detectable diesel and <br /> gasoline range petroleum hydrocarbons. <br /> The depth to groundwater at this site (approximately 53 feet- see attached <br /> Figure 3 Water Level Map) suggest that any remaining hydrocarbons above 27 <br /> feet should not pose a threat to groundwater. Even at the "wet" year high <br /> water mark of 40 feet (bgs) an approximate 13 to 28 foot buffer may exist <br /> between the last detectable contamination in the excavation and the water <br /> table. No evidence of recent contact with the water table was observed in the <br /> soil contained in the split spoon sampler from the 40 -42 foot interval sample. <br /> Manifestation of recent groundwater contact may include oxidized iron <br /> laminae and elevated moisture content. <br /> Although no groundwater samples were collected or tested, several factors <br /> ' suggest that the groundwater has not been impacted. The degraded nature of <br /> the contaminant, diesels' tendency to not migrate far, a 13 to 28 foot buffer <br /> between high water and the deepest observed contamination, and the <br /> ' attenuating action of the silt layer at 25 feet strongly suggest that the <br /> remaining diesel above 25 feet is not in a position to threaten groundwater. <br /> In time these low concentrations will attenuate to negligible levels. Also <br /> ' because the former excavation is capped with concrete we do not expect <br /> percolating rainwater from coming into contact with the remnant <br /> hydrocarbons. <br /> ' Therefore Geological Technics Inc. concludes that the evidence gathered <br /> during this investigation suggest that a groundwater study is not warranted <br /> ' and we recommend that no further action take place. We feel that it is <br /> reasonable for the PHS/EHD to corroborate with the staff of the <br /> CRWQCBCVR and consider the candidacy of this site for closure. <br />