My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ACACIA
>
501
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0515006
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 4:46:31 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 4:18:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0515006
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0012004
FACILITY_NAME
FONZIA CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
501
STREET_NAME
ACACIA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
501 ACACIA ST
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
j <br /> t <br /> b <br /> { TABLE #3 <br /> Section II Closures <br /> In addition, the following information and appropriate data for Appendix A <br />{ shall be submitted when evaluating Case 2 Closures. All conditions listed in <br /> Case 1172 (page 9) must be met <br /> SITE HISTORY <br /> 1 . Describe the size, age, condition, use, and type of tank removed, and <br /> submit a map showing the former tank system and existing buildings on <br /> site. <br /> 2. Submit an evaluation of the inventory records reviewed for the three <br /> months prior to removal in order to estimate the quantity of product <br /> released. ;I <br /> 3. Submit a summary of past site information, such as precision test <br /> results, tank repairs or construction activities. <br /> 4. What types of businesses operated a-c this site previously? <br /> 4 5. What was theroduct volume <br /> p pumped per month for each tank. <br /> 6. Submit a survey of nearby wells. <br /> 7. List other sources of site specific information checked (e.g. Utility <br /> Company, Public Works Department, US a66 State Geologic Surveys, State <br /> and Count Health <br /> County Department, County and Regional Planning, local fire <br /> departments, etc. ) . i <br /> 31h <br /> SITE CHARACTERISTICS <br /> 1. Describe evidence of leakage resent e�: stained soil free <br /> 9 P ( `g• product, <br /> odors, etc. ) . <br /> k 2. Describe visible preferential pathways (sand lens, root holes, etc. ) in <br /> the excavation pits. <br /> 3. Submit site map of surface waterbodies (ponds, creeks, stream, etc. ) or <br /> possible subsurface conduits (sewers, septic tanks, utility lines, etc. ) <br /> in the vicinity of the site. <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS j? <br /> (If the answer to any of the following i,.- N0 ) full explanations are required) <br /> 1 . Were additional samples (other than the;'�minimum required) taken where <br /> obviously contaminated soil was present? <br /> 2. Did sampling and analytical protocols conform to standards described in <br /> LUFT and this document? <br /> 3. Were the appropriate laboratory analyses used (see Table 2)? <br /> 4. Were the laboratory analysis and QA/QC results submitted? <br /> 5. In cases of high water table, a) were samples taken from the sidewalls <br />! — and b) was water present in the excavation pit? <br /> 6. Were soil samples taken for every 20 lineal feet of underground piping? <br /> 7. Were depth and location of soil samples!�submitted? <br /> E <br /> -21- <br /> �� I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.