My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ARCH
>
3568
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544095
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 4:04:07 PM
Creation date
2/4/2019 4:02:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0544095
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0025080
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO (PROPOSED)
STREET_NUMBER
3568
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ARCH
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3568 E ARCH RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 28, 1991 BALBI&CHANG ASSOCIATES <br /> File No. 1525-69 <br /> surface. This major silty/clayey soil layer generally grades damp, medium stiff to very stiff, <br /> and low plasticity. Some sandy soils exist within this major layer. <br /> i <br /> I <br /> D. Groundwater Conditions <br /> No free groundwater was observed in any of the test,borings to their maximum explored <br /> depths at the time of our field exploration. Information from the Environmental Health <br /> Division of San Joaquin County and the property owner indicates the localized depth to first <br /> groundwater table is approximately 50 to 70 feet below the existing ground surface. <br /> Groundwater conditions at the site are expected to fluctuate in the future due to factors such <br /> as seasonal rainfall, groundwater pumping and recharging, seepage conditions and <br /> construction activities. However, the influence of these factors could not be determined at <br /> the time of our investigation. <br /> III. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> Our investigation program indicates the primary:geotechnical`concern of this project site is <br /> the near surface expansive soil. The major problem associated with the highly expansive soil <br /> is.the significant volumetric changes due to-the cyclic shrinkage and swelling. .Structure <br /> founded on expansive soil stratum may experience structural distress-during its useful life. <br /> Therefore, it is important to eliminate or to minimize the effects of expansive soil on the <br /> proposed structure. <br /> i <br /> There are several approaches, such as replacing the expansive soil with nonexpansive <br /> material, chemical treatment, deep foundation, or raised floor system, may be employed to <br /> reduce the potential of structure distress. Based on the proposed building function, the light <br /> building loads, the availability of a nearby source of select nonexpansive material, and the <br /> economical benefits, it is our opinion that the lime treatment method may be the most feasible <br /> solution for this site. <br /> The expansive site soil beneath the proposed Mini-Market building may be properly treated <br /> with lime to reduce expansion potential prior to foundation construction. After lime treatment <br /> is properly performed and the results are verified, the Mini-Market building may be supported <br /> by conventional spread footings. Another benefit of lime treatment is the increase of soil <br /> Page 4 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.