Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 5.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS <br /> MW-13, the benzene action level was exceeded in the samples collected at each ch depth Based on <br /> the quarterly sampling results, the benzene action level was exceeded in wells MW-13 and <br /> VM-2 Concentrations of toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, and MTBE did not exceed action levels <br /> in the three wells <br /> 5.2 HISTORICAL TRENDS OF PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IN SUBSURFACE <br /> 5.2.1 Soil Trends <br /> Based on soil sample results summarized in Table 3-1 for previous subsurface investigations, the <br /> majority of the petroleum hydrocarbons appear to be in the vadose zone The vadose zone soil <br /> plume appears to be bounded by borings ABA, A13-2, MW-13, SB18, and SB-15 (GEOCON, <br /> 1996) The volume of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil was estimated by GEOCON to be <br /> 1,530 to 2,290 cubic meters (2,000 to 3,000 cubic yards) GEOCON did not estimate the mass of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons in soil URSGWC has estimated the masses of TPH-g and benzene in <br /> soil based on soil analytical data reported by EA and GEOCON A discussion of the estimated <br /> masses of TPH-g and benzene in soil is included in Section 5 4 <br /> 5.2.2 Groundwater Trends <br /> The historical results of petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater through Third Quarter 1999 are <br /> presented in Table 3-2 Historical concentration trends in groundwater for four wells (MW-13, <br /> MW-14, VW-1, and VM-2) are presented on Figure 5-4 Concentrations below the laboratory <br /> detection limit were plotted as half of the detection limit The figures depict significant decreases <br /> in both TPH-g and benzene concentrations with time in conjunction with the increase in <br /> groundwater elevations with time MTBE concentrations have fluctuated in the four wells <br /> depicted on Figure 5-4, however, the magnitude has remained relatively constant since 1997 <br /> 5.3 SLUG TEST RESULTS <br />' Slug tests were performed in wells MW-11, MW-13, and MW-24 at Shop 10 Table 5-3 provides <br /> a summary of the transmissivities and hydraulic conductivities that were estimated for the <br /> respective wells for both the falling head and rising head slug tests The results were generally <br /> slightly higher for the rising head test as compared to the falling head test The estimated <br />' hydraulic conductivities ranged from 12 x 10"2 to 1 9 x 10"3 centimeters/second (cm/s) The <br /> transmissivity, calculated assuming an aquifer thickness equaled to the well screen length, ranged <br /> from 1 7 to 6 9 square centimeters/second (CM2 Is) These results indicate a groundwater velocity <br />' ranging from 13 x 10'5 to 8 4 x 10-5 cm/s, or 4 to 27 meters/year(14 to 87 feet/year), based on the <br /> slug test data and the April 1999 groundwater gradient calculated by PSI These hydraulic <br /> conductivity estimates are indicative of a soil type consistent with sand/silty sand However, the <br />' hydraulic conductivity estimated by slug testing may be overestimated due to the influence of the <br /> S IPRa4+10e0100041sHOPIO�S140PIasaooe 5-3 UBS Greiner Woodward Clyde <br />