Laserfiche WebLink
.b 33 #3^c0 P 2-1=4 <br /> AI Sari ler <br /> f <br /> Model <br /> Speclificeti®nsa j <br /> i <br /> Total Length 17 38 in 1 <br /> 04ameter 2.75 in f <br /> Weight 6 _- <br /> Total Capac,ty 2100 cc a <br /> Capacity Container <br /> Sart le 1 ea 40.0 mi �- <br /> p F tY <br /> Materials 321 Stainless Steel <br /> Contamoonantsa vat- <br /> VOCs Organic Salts _. <br /> 9 Conzeniriar�t species reccvety in 2 diamete <br /> NVOCs Inorganic Saits ,,ells In a :.ee_Acnrc aquifer with a <br /> L NAPLs Vetals .::"` plume <br /> DNAPLS <br /> instalted in a flowing aquifer, the KASIS Sampler <br /> will recover concentrattons and species which <br /> other sampling methods will not. The act of <br /> purging the well, in most cases, either dilutes the <br /> sampte. or changes its chemical character This <br /> --- change in most cases provides ambiguous results. <br /> I <br /> -- _ Benefits= <br /> -- -. - Time for first sample (VOCs) on-site 8 min <br /> w -j w�� 1 2 hrs <br /> Total time (VOCs) or-- (8 we ls) <br /> N - Decontamination s:o <br /> Sampiing Program Savings 80 % <br /> u r <br /> Ircreasec Scec,es Recovery = 48 % <br /> Sa.'' ,,jC_s cirecoly into a single 40riil VOA via] <br /> 2' z7e°e• Supenor it-sits: depth-eiscrete sampling results <br /> Slationa�' ��:�=e• ..•_ c <br /> The KABIS Sampler by vtrtue of its <br /> sampling method, wrli Trot tend to draw into <br /> e well. eoncentrattons or species not _ <br /> sident in or in cicse proximity to the well. Emma <br /> As shown above, purging a well (even micro- <br /> purging) in a stationery aquiferwill skew the �- � ^ <br /> sampling results by drawing in species and <br /> concentrations which are not resident eitherin cr around the well Conversely the <br /> f0i[n%-g1 C gar cr-ach shows that it a_well 1 nijL 1 5 ' <br />