Laserfiche WebLink
New West Petroleum #1003 2 - 3 April 2008 <br /> Lodi, San Joaquin County <br /> while the estimated MTBE mass in groundwater is 3.5 gallons. Due to the shallow depth to <br /> groundwater, soil vapor extraction has not been considered effective or feasible for treatment of <br /> soil, and was not evaluated in the FS. An Enhanced Leak Detection Test conducted in <br /> January 2006 confirmed the absence of leaks in the existing underground storage tanks <br /> system. <br /> The FS discussed the beneficial uses of groundwater under the Regional Board's Basin Plan, <br /> including Municipal and Domestic Supply, Agricultural Supply, and Industrial Supply. The FS <br /> proposes the following applicable water quality goals (WQGs): <br /> COPC WOGS Legal Authority <br /> MTBE 5 u /L Secondary MCL <br /> Benzene 1 u /L Prima MCL <br /> Toluene 150 u /L Prima MCL <br /> Eth (benzene 700 u /L Prima MCL <br /> Xylenes 1,750 u /L Prima MCL <br /> 1 -MCL = Maximum Contaminant Limit, Title 22 (see comments) California Code of Regulations (CCR). The <br /> Secondary MCL is the Taste and Odor Threshold, while the Primary MCL is the State and/or Federal limit for public <br /> water supplied by a purveyor. <br /> The FS evaluated the following technologies for final remediation: <br /> • Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA), <br /> • Ozone Injection (03 Inj), and <br /> • Expanded Groundwater Pump And Treatment (GWP&7). <br /> Alternative 1: MNA consists of monitoring the MTBE groundwater plume until there is evidence <br /> of plume stability and declining concentrations in monitoring wells, combined with no evidence <br /> of vapor intrusion into buildings, to establish a recommendation for a low risk closure. MNA <br /> also looks for evidence of biodegradation of MTBE by microorganisms. The estimated cost for <br /> MNA lasting 20 years is $690,000. While MNA is feasible, the lack of hydraulic control of the <br /> MTBE plume and the continued migration threat towards the municipal supply wells negated <br /> this alternative. <br /> Alternative 2: 03 Inj involves construction of new injection wells connected by underground <br /> piping to an ozone generator. The 03 injected into the MTBE plume quickly breaks down into <br /> oxygen which reacts chemically with the MTBE, degrading it to byproducts tertiary butyl alcohol, <br /> 2-propenol, acetone, pyruvic acid and eventually to biomass, carbon dioxide, and water. The <br /> oxygen also dissolves into the water and aids in aerobic degradation by microorganisms. The <br /> estimated cost for 03 Inj was $570,000 over four years of operations and two years of post- <br /> treatment groundwater monitoring. As discussed above for MNA, 03 Inj does not provide <br /> hydraulic control of the MTBE plume, and was likewise rejected. <br /> Alternative 3: The expansion of the existing GWP&T also requires construction of new wells <br /> connected by underground piping to a treatment system, however the wells are groundwater <br /> extraction by submersible electric pumps and the treatment system is currently onsite and <br /> operational. Water would be pumped back to the existing onsite groundwater treatment system <br />